Execution Details COMPLETED

{
  "aml_screening": {
    "adverse_media": "no_hits",
    "aml_status": "cleared",
    "compliance_score": 96.8,
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"aml_status\": \"cleared\", \"watchlist_check\": \"no_matches\", \"pep_screening\": \"not_identified\", \"sanctions_check\": \"cleared\", \"adverse_media\": \"no_hits\", \"risk_rating\": \"low\", \"compliance_score\": 96.8, \"screening_date\": \"2024-07-15\", \"manual_review_required\": false}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.356123,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.641749",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.285626",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.641749",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "manual_review_required": false,
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"aml_status\": \"cleared\", \"watchlist_check\": \"no_matches\", \"pep_screening\": \"not_identified\", \"sanctions_check\": \"cleared\", \"adverse_media\": \"no_hits\", \"risk_rating\": \"low\", \"compliance_score\": 96.8, \"screening_date\": \"2024-07-15\", \"manual_review_required\": false}\n",
    "pep_screening": "not_identified",
    "return_code": 0,
    "risk_rating": "low",
    "sanctions_check": "cleared",
    "screening_date": "2024-07-15",
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "aml_screening",
    "watchlist_check": "no_matches"
  },
  "analyze_bank_statements": {
    "account_balance_trend": "stable",
    "average_monthly_credits": 7200,
    "bounced_transactions": 0,
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"average_monthly_credits\": 7200, \"salary_credits_consistent\": true, \"account_balance_trend\": \"stable\", \"minimum_balance\": 15000, \"maximum_balance\": 45000, \"bounced_transactions\": 0, \"loan_emis_detected\": 2, \"total_monthly_debits\": 5800, \"financial_discipline_score\": 85.5, \"irregular_transactions\": false}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.481695,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.755179",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.273484",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.755179",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "financial_discipline_score": 85.5,
    "irregular_transactions": false,
    "loan_emis_detected": 2,
    "maximum_balance": 45000,
    "minimum_balance": 15000,
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"average_monthly_credits\": 7200, \"salary_credits_consistent\": true, \"account_balance_trend\": \"stable\", \"minimum_balance\": 15000, \"maximum_balance\": 45000, \"bounced_transactions\": 0, \"loan_emis_detected\": 2, \"total_monthly_debits\": 5800, \"financial_discipline_score\": 85.5, \"irregular_transactions\": false}\n",
    "return_code": 0,
    "salary_credits_consistent": true,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "analyze_bank_statements",
    "total_monthly_debits": 5800
  },
  "analyze_credit_history": {
    "average_account_age": "32 months",
    "credit_limit_utilization": 35.2,
    "credit_mix": {
      "auto_loans": 1,
      "credit_cards": 3,
      "home_loans": 0,
      "other": 1,
      "personal_loans": 1
    },
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"oldest_account_age\": \"60 months\", \"average_account_age\": \"32 months\", \"credit_mix\": {\"credit_cards\": 3, \"personal_loans\": 1, \"auto_loans\": 1, \"home_loans\": 0, \"other\": 1}, \"repayment_behavior\": {\"never_missed\": 85.0, \"30_days_late\": 12.0, \"60_days_late\": 2.5, \"90_days_late\": 0.5, \"defaults\": 0.0}, \"credit_limit_utilization\": 35.2, \"recent_credit_behavior\": \"stable\"}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.392463,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.375201",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:29.982738",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.375201",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "oldest_account_age": "60 months",
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"oldest_account_age\": \"60 months\", \"average_account_age\": \"32 months\", \"credit_mix\": {\"credit_cards\": 3, \"personal_loans\": 1, \"auto_loans\": 1, \"home_loans\": 0, \"other\": 1}, \"repayment_behavior\": {\"never_missed\": 85.0, \"30_days_late\": 12.0, \"60_days_late\": 2.5, \"90_days_late\": 0.5, \"defaults\": 0.0}, \"credit_limit_utilization\": 35.2, \"recent_credit_behavior\": \"stable\"}\n",
    "recent_credit_behavior": "stable",
    "repayment_behavior": {
      "30_days_late": 12.0,
      "60_days_late": 2.5,
      "90_days_late": 0.5,
      "defaults": 0.0,
      "never_missed": 85.0
    },
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "analyze_credit_history"
  },
  "analyze_salary_slips": {
    "annual_gross": 102000,
    "annual_net": 81600,
    "deductions": {
      "insurance": 300,
      "pf": 500,
      "tax": 1200
    },
    "employer": "Tech Corp Ltd",
    "employment_duration": "2.5 years",
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"monthly_gross\": 8500, \"monthly_net\": 6800, \"annual_gross\": 102000, \"annual_net\": 81600, \"employer\": \"Tech Corp Ltd\", \"employment_duration\": \"2.5 years\", \"salary_consistency\": true, \"recent_increment\": true, \"deductions\": {\"tax\": 1200, \"pf\": 500, \"insurance\": 300}}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.333144,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.568852",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.235708",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.568852",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "monthly_gross": 8500,
    "monthly_net": 6800,
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"monthly_gross\": 8500, \"monthly_net\": 6800, \"annual_gross\": 102000, \"annual_net\": 81600, \"employer\": \"Tech Corp Ltd\", \"employment_duration\": \"2.5 years\", \"salary_consistency\": true, \"recent_increment\": true, \"deductions\": {\"tax\": 1200, \"pf\": 500, \"insurance\": 300}}\n",
    "recent_increment": true,
    "return_code": 0,
    "salary_consistency": true,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "analyze_salary_slips"
  },
  "application_quality_check": {
    "agent_type": "assistant",
    "ai_response": "```json\n{\n  \"data_completeness_and_accuracy\": {\n    \"missing_fields\": [],\n    \"validation_passed\": true,\n    \"completion_percentage\": 100.0,\n    \"assessment\": \"The application data is complete with no missing fields, and all provided information has passed validation checks.\"\n  },\n  \"consistency_of_information\": {\n    \"assessment\": \"Since there are no missing fields and the validation has passed, the information appears to be consistent. However, further details about the specific customer info would be needed to assess consistency in context.\"\n  },\n  \"red_flags_or_inconsistencies\": {\n    \"assessment\": \"No red flags or inconsistencies have been identified based on the provided validation results. However, a deeper review of the actual customer information would be necessary to identify any potential issues.\"\n  },\n  \"overall_application_quality_score\": 95,\n  \"overall_assessment\": \"The application is of high quality due to its completeness and successful validation. A score of 95 reflects the strong quality, but further context on the customer information would be needed for a perfect score.\"\n}\n```",
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "agent_type": "assistant",
        "execution_details": {
          "agent_type": "assistant",
          "input_length": 246,
          "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
          "output_length": 1113,
          "provider": "openai",
          "system_message": "You are an expert loan underwriting analyst. Review the application data and assess its quality.\n\nEvaluate:\n1. Data completeness and accuracy\n2. Consistency of information\n3. Red flags or inconsistencies\n4. Overall application quality score (1-100)\n\nReturn a JSON response with your assessment.\n"
        },
        "input_format": "json",
        "model_client_id": "underwriting_analyst",
        "output": "```json\n{\n  \"data_completeness_and_accuracy\": {\n    \"missing_fields\": [],\n    \"validation_passed\": true,\n    \"completion_percentage\": 100.0,\n    \"assessment\": \"The application data is complete with no missing fields, and all provided information has passed validation checks.\"\n  },\n  \"consistency_of_information\": {\n    \"assessment\": \"Since there are no missing fields and the validation has passed, the information appears to be consistent. However, further details about the specific customer info would be needed to assess consistency in context.\"\n  },\n  \"red_flags_or_inconsistencies\": {\n    \"assessment\": \"No red flags or inconsistencies have been identified based on the provided validation results. However, a deeper review of the actual customer information would be necessary to identify any potential issues.\"\n  },\n  \"overall_application_quality_score\": 95,\n  \"overall_assessment\": \"The application is of high quality due to its completeness and successful validation. A score of 95 reflects the strong quality, but further context on the customer information would be needed for a perfect score.\"\n}\n```\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"```json\\n{\\n  \\\"data_completeness_and_accuracy\\\": {\\n    \\\"missing_fields\\\": [],\\n    \\\"validation_passed\\\": true,\\n    \\\"completion_percentage\\\": 100.0,\\n    \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"The application data is complete with no missing fields, and all provided information has passed validation checks.\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"consistency_of_information\\\": {\\n    \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"Since there are no missing fields and the validation has passed, the information appears to be consistent. However, further details about the specific customer info would be needed to assess consistency in context.\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"red_flags_or_inconsistencies\\\": {\\n    \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"No red flags or inconsistencies have been identified based on the provided validation results. However, a deeper review of the actual customer information would be necessary to identify any potential issues.\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"overall_application_quality_score\\\": 95,\\n  \\\"overall_assessment\\\": \\\"The application is of high quality due to its completeness and successful validation. A score of 95 reflects the strong quality, but further context on the customer information would be needed for a perfect score.\\\"\\n}\\n```\", \"model_client_id\": \"underwriting_analyst\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
        "output_format": "json",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 5.466944,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:15.254208",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:09.787264",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:15.254208",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
    "model_client_id": "underwriting_analyst",
    "output": "```json\n{\n  \"data_completeness_and_accuracy\": {\n    \"missing_fields\": [],\n    \"validation_passed\": true,\n    \"completion_percentage\": 100.0,\n    \"assessment\": \"The application data is complete with no missing fields, and all provided information has passed validation checks.\"\n  },\n  \"consistency_of_information\": {\n    \"assessment\": \"Since there are no missing fields and the validation has passed, the information appears to be consistent. However, further details about the specific customer info would be needed to assess consistency in context.\"\n  },\n  \"red_flags_or_inconsistencies\": {\n    \"assessment\": \"No red flags or inconsistencies have been identified based on the provided validation results. However, a deeper review of the actual customer information would be necessary to identify any potential issues.\"\n  },\n  \"overall_application_quality_score\": 95,\n  \"overall_assessment\": \"The application is of high quality due to its completeness and successful validation. A score of 95 reflects the strong quality, but further context on the customer information would be needed for a perfect score.\"\n}\n```\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"```json\\n{\\n  \\\"data_completeness_and_accuracy\\\": {\\n    \\\"missing_fields\\\": [],\\n    \\\"validation_passed\\\": true,\\n    \\\"completion_percentage\\\": 100.0,\\n    \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"The application data is complete with no missing fields, and all provided information has passed validation checks.\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"consistency_of_information\\\": {\\n    \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"Since there are no missing fields and the validation has passed, the information appears to be consistent. However, further details about the specific customer info would be needed to assess consistency in context.\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"red_flags_or_inconsistencies\\\": {\\n    \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"No red flags or inconsistencies have been identified based on the provided validation results. However, a deeper review of the actual customer information would be necessary to identify any potential issues.\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"overall_application_quality_score\\\": 95,\\n  \\\"overall_assessment\\\": \\\"The application is of high quality due to its completeness and successful validation. A score of 95 reflects the strong quality, but further context on the customer information would be needed for a perfect score.\\\"\\n}\\n```\", \"model_client_id\": \"underwriting_analyst\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
    "provider": "openai",
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "application_quality_check"
  },
  "assess_existing_loans": {
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"total_outstanding\": 125000, \"number_of_loans\": 2, \"loan_details\": [{\"type\": \"personal_loan\", \"outstanding\": 45000, \"emi\": 3500, \"remaining_tenure\": \"18 months\"}, {\"type\": \"auto_loan\", \"outstanding\": 80000, \"emi\": 4200, \"remaining_tenure\": \"24 months\"}], \"total_monthly_emi\": 7700, \"repayment_track_record\": \"excellent\", \"loan_burden_ratio\": 0.28}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.316454,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.646978",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.330524",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.646978",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "loan_burden_ratio": 0.28,
    "loan_details": [
      {
        "emi": 3500,
        "outstanding": 45000,
        "remaining_tenure": "18 months",
        "type": "personal_loan"
      },
      {
        "emi": 4200,
        "outstanding": 80000,
        "remaining_tenure": "24 months",
        "type": "auto_loan"
      }
    ],
    "number_of_loans": 2,
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"total_outstanding\": 125000, \"number_of_loans\": 2, \"loan_details\": [{\"type\": \"personal_loan\", \"outstanding\": 45000, \"emi\": 3500, \"remaining_tenure\": \"18 months\"}, {\"type\": \"auto_loan\", \"outstanding\": 80000, \"emi\": 4200, \"remaining_tenure\": \"24 months\"}], \"total_monthly_emi\": 7700, \"repayment_track_record\": \"excellent\", \"loan_burden_ratio\": 0.28}\n",
    "repayment_track_record": "excellent",
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "assess_existing_loans",
    "total_monthly_emi": 7700,
    "total_outstanding": 125000
  },
  "calculate_credit_score": {
    "error": "Python script failed with return code 1: Traceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"/tmp/tmph0u0c611.py\", line 9, in \u003cmodule\u003e\n    cibil_score = UNRESOLVED_check_cibil_score.credit_score\n                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nNameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_check_cibil_score\u0027 is not defined\n",
    "execution_details": {
      "failed": true,
      "message_sent": true,
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "output": "Task failed: Python script failed with return code 1: Traceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"/tmp/tmph0u0c611.py\", line 9, in \u003cmodule\u003e\n    cibil_score = UNRESOLVED_check_cibil_score.credit_score\n                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nNameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_check_cibil_score\u0027 is not defined\n",
    "status": "FAILED",
    "task_id": "calculate_credit_score"
  },
  "calculate_debt_to_income": {
    "error": "Python script failed with return code 1: Traceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"/tmp/tmp3kepdkrg.py\", line 20, in \u003cmodule\u003e\n    max_allowed_ratio = UNRESOLVED_variables.max_debt_to_income_ratio\n                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nNameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_variables\u0027 is not defined\n",
    "execution_details": {
      "failed": true,
      "message_sent": true,
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "output": "Task failed: Python script failed with return code 1: Traceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"/tmp/tmp3kepdkrg.py\", line 20, in \u003cmodule\u003e\n    max_allowed_ratio = UNRESOLVED_variables.max_debt_to_income_ratio\n                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nNameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_variables\u0027 is not defined\n",
    "status": "FAILED",
    "task_id": "calculate_debt_to_income"
  },
  "check_cibil_score": {
    "active_accounts": 6,
    "closed_accounts": 2,
    "credit_history_length": "5 years",
    "credit_score": 720,
    "credit_utilization": 35.5,
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"credit_score\": 720, \"score_range\": \"Good\", \"last_updated\": \"2024-06-01\", \"credit_history_length\": \"5 years\", \"total_accounts\": 8, \"active_accounts\": 6, \"closed_accounts\": 2, \"credit_utilization\": 35.5, \"payment_history\": \"99% on-time\", \"recent_inquiries\": 2}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.302929,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.040229",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:29.737300",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.040229",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "last_updated": "2024-06-01",
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"credit_score\": 720, \"score_range\": \"Good\", \"last_updated\": \"2024-06-01\", \"credit_history_length\": \"5 years\", \"total_accounts\": 8, \"active_accounts\": 6, \"closed_accounts\": 2, \"credit_utilization\": 35.5, \"payment_history\": \"99% on-time\", \"recent_inquiries\": 2}\n",
    "payment_history": "99% on-time",
    "recent_inquiries": 2,
    "return_code": 0,
    "score_range": "Good",
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "check_cibil_score",
    "total_accounts": 8
  },
  "compliance_consolidation": {
    "agent_type": "assistant",
    "ai_response": "```json\n{\n  \"overall_compliance_status\": \"Non-compliant\",\n  \"risk_assessment\": {\n    \"high_risk_areas\": [\n      \"KYC Compliance\",\n      \"AML Screening\",\n      \"Regulatory Compliance\"\n    ],\n    \"low_risk_areas\": [\n      \"Internal Policy\"\n    ]\n  },\n  \"compliance_gaps_or_concerns\": [\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"KYC Compliance\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Failure to meet Know Your Customer requirements can lead to identity fraud and regulatory penalties.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"AML Screening\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Inadequate Anti-Money Laundering screening increases the risk of financial crime.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"Regulatory Compliance\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Non-compliance with regulatory requirements can result in fines and legal action.\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"recommendations_for_proceeding\": [\n    \"Immediately address the unresolved KYC compliance issues by implementing a robust verification process.\",\n    \"Enhance AML screening procedures to ensure all transactions are monitored and flagged appropriately.\",\n    \"Conduct a thorough review of regulatory compliance requirements and rectify any outstanding issues.\",\n    \"Continue to maintain and monitor internal policy compliance, as it currently meets the necessary criteria.\"\n  ],\n  \"compliance_confidence_score\": 30\n}\n```",
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "agent_type": "assistant",
        "execution_details": {
          "agent_type": "assistant",
          "input_length": 571,
          "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
          "output_length": 1367,
          "provider": "openai",
          "system_message": "You are a compliance officer specializing in loan underwriting compliance.\n\nReview all compliance check results and provide:\n1. Overall compliance status\n2. Risk assessment\n3. Any compliance gaps or concerns\n4. Recommendations for proceeding\n5. Compliance confidence score (1-100)\n\nReturn a comprehensive compliance assessment in JSON format.\n"
        },
        "input_format": "json",
        "model_client_id": "compliance_reviewer",
        "output": "```json\n{\n  \"overall_compliance_status\": \"Non-compliant\",\n  \"risk_assessment\": {\n    \"high_risk_areas\": [\n      \"KYC Compliance\",\n      \"AML Screening\",\n      \"Regulatory Compliance\"\n    ],\n    \"low_risk_areas\": [\n      \"Internal Policy\"\n    ]\n  },\n  \"compliance_gaps_or_concerns\": [\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"KYC Compliance\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Failure to meet Know Your Customer requirements can lead to identity fraud and regulatory penalties.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"AML Screening\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Inadequate Anti-Money Laundering screening increases the risk of financial crime.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"Regulatory Compliance\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Non-compliance with regulatory requirements can result in fines and legal action.\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"recommendations_for_proceeding\": [\n    \"Immediately address the unresolved KYC compliance issues by implementing a robust verification process.\",\n    \"Enhance AML screening procedures to ensure all transactions are monitored and flagged appropriately.\",\n    \"Conduct a thorough review of regulatory compliance requirements and rectify any outstanding issues.\",\n    \"Continue to maintain and monitor internal policy compliance, as it currently meets the necessary criteria.\"\n  ],\n  \"compliance_confidence_score\": 30\n}\n```\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"```json\\n{\\n  \\\"overall_compliance_status\\\": \\\"Non-compliant\\\",\\n  \\\"risk_assessment\\\": {\\n    \\\"high_risk_areas\\\": [\\n      \\\"KYC Compliance\\\",\\n      \\\"AML Screening\\\",\\n      \\\"Regulatory Compliance\\\"\\n    ],\\n    \\\"low_risk_areas\\\": [\\n      \\\"Internal Policy\\\"\\n    ]\\n  },\\n  \\\"compliance_gaps_or_concerns\\\": [\\n    {\\n      \\\"issue\\\": \\\"KYC Compliance\\\",\\n      \\\"status\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED\\\",\\n      \\\"concern\\\": \\\"Failure to meet Know Your Customer requirements can lead to identity fraud and regulatory penalties.\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"issue\\\": \\\"AML Screening\\\",\\n      \\\"status\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED\\\",\\n      \\\"concern\\\": \\\"Inadequate Anti-Money Laundering screening increases the risk of financial crime.\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"issue\\\": \\\"Regulatory Compliance\\\",\\n      \\\"status\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED\\\",\\n      \\\"concern\\\": \\\"Non-compliance with regulatory requirements can result in fines and legal action.\\\"\\n    }\\n  ],\\n  \\\"recommendations_for_proceeding\\\": [\\n    \\\"Immediately address the unresolved KYC compliance issues by implementing a robust verification process.\\\",\\n    \\\"Enhance AML screening procedures to ensure all transactions are monitored and flagged appropriately.\\\",\\n    \\\"Conduct a thorough review of regulatory compliance requirements and rectify any outstanding issues.\\\",\\n    \\\"Continue to maintain and monitor internal policy compliance, as it currently meets the necessary criteria.\\\"\\n  ],\\n  \\\"compliance_confidence_score\\\": 30\\n}\\n```\", \"model_client_id\": \"compliance_reviewer\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
        "output_format": "json",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 6.413679,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:40:03.605586",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:57.191907",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:40:03.605586",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
    "model_client_id": "compliance_reviewer",
    "output": "```json\n{\n  \"overall_compliance_status\": \"Non-compliant\",\n  \"risk_assessment\": {\n    \"high_risk_areas\": [\n      \"KYC Compliance\",\n      \"AML Screening\",\n      \"Regulatory Compliance\"\n    ],\n    \"low_risk_areas\": [\n      \"Internal Policy\"\n    ]\n  },\n  \"compliance_gaps_or_concerns\": [\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"KYC Compliance\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Failure to meet Know Your Customer requirements can lead to identity fraud and regulatory penalties.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"AML Screening\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Inadequate Anti-Money Laundering screening increases the risk of financial crime.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"Regulatory Compliance\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Non-compliance with regulatory requirements can result in fines and legal action.\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"recommendations_for_proceeding\": [\n    \"Immediately address the unresolved KYC compliance issues by implementing a robust verification process.\",\n    \"Enhance AML screening procedures to ensure all transactions are monitored and flagged appropriately.\",\n    \"Conduct a thorough review of regulatory compliance requirements and rectify any outstanding issues.\",\n    \"Continue to maintain and monitor internal policy compliance, as it currently meets the necessary criteria.\"\n  ],\n  \"compliance_confidence_score\": 30\n}\n```\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"```json\\n{\\n  \\\"overall_compliance_status\\\": \\\"Non-compliant\\\",\\n  \\\"risk_assessment\\\": {\\n    \\\"high_risk_areas\\\": [\\n      \\\"KYC Compliance\\\",\\n      \\\"AML Screening\\\",\\n      \\\"Regulatory Compliance\\\"\\n    ],\\n    \\\"low_risk_areas\\\": [\\n      \\\"Internal Policy\\\"\\n    ]\\n  },\\n  \\\"compliance_gaps_or_concerns\\\": [\\n    {\\n      \\\"issue\\\": \\\"KYC Compliance\\\",\\n      \\\"status\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED\\\",\\n      \\\"concern\\\": \\\"Failure to meet Know Your Customer requirements can lead to identity fraud and regulatory penalties.\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"issue\\\": \\\"AML Screening\\\",\\n      \\\"status\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED\\\",\\n      \\\"concern\\\": \\\"Inadequate Anti-Money Laundering screening increases the risk of financial crime.\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"issue\\\": \\\"Regulatory Compliance\\\",\\n      \\\"status\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED\\\",\\n      \\\"concern\\\": \\\"Non-compliance with regulatory requirements can result in fines and legal action.\\\"\\n    }\\n  ],\\n  \\\"recommendations_for_proceeding\\\": [\\n    \\\"Immediately address the unresolved KYC compliance issues by implementing a robust verification process.\\\",\\n    \\\"Enhance AML screening procedures to ensure all transactions are monitored and flagged appropriately.\\\",\\n    \\\"Conduct a thorough review of regulatory compliance requirements and rectify any outstanding issues.\\\",\\n    \\\"Continue to maintain and monitor internal policy compliance, as it currently meets the necessary criteria.\\\"\\n  ],\\n  \\\"compliance_confidence_score\\\": 30\\n}\\n```\", \"model_client_id\": \"compliance_reviewer\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
    "provider": "openai",
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "compliance_consolidation"
  },
  "consolidate_document_verification": {
    "agent_type": "assistant",
    "ai_response": "```json\n{\n  \"overall_verification_success_rate\": 100,\n  \"consistency_across_documents\": {\n    \"name_match\": true,\n    \"address_match\": true\n  },\n  \"risk_factors_identified\": [],\n  \"recommendation_for_proceeding\": \"All documents have been successfully verified with high scores and consistent information. Proceed with confidence.\"\n}\n```",
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "agent_type": "assistant",
        "execution_details": {
          "agent_type": "assistant",
          "input_length": 822,
          "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
          "output_length": 336,
          "provider": "openai",
          "system_message": "You are a document verification specialist. Analyze all document verification results and provide a comprehensive assessment.\n\nConsider:\n1. Overall verification success rate\n2. Consistency across documents\n3. Risk factors identified\n4. Recommendation for proceeding\n\nReturn a JSON response with your analysis.\n"
        },
        "input_format": "json",
        "model_client_id": "underwriting_analyst",
        "output": "```json\n{\n  \"overall_verification_success_rate\": 100,\n  \"consistency_across_documents\": {\n    \"name_match\": true,\n    \"address_match\": true\n  },\n  \"risk_factors_identified\": [],\n  \"recommendation_for_proceeding\": \"All documents have been successfully verified with high scores and consistent information. Proceed with confidence.\"\n}\n```\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"```json\\n{\\n  \\\"overall_verification_success_rate\\\": 100,\\n  \\\"consistency_across_documents\\\": {\\n    \\\"name_match\\\": true,\\n    \\\"address_match\\\": true\\n  },\\n  \\\"risk_factors_identified\\\": [],\\n  \\\"recommendation_for_proceeding\\\": \\\"All documents have been successfully verified with high scores and consistent information. Proceed with confidence.\\\"\\n}\\n```\", \"model_client_id\": \"underwriting_analyst\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
        "output_format": "json",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 2.742992,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.917495",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:15.174503",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.917495",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
    "model_client_id": "underwriting_analyst",
    "output": "```json\n{\n  \"overall_verification_success_rate\": 100,\n  \"consistency_across_documents\": {\n    \"name_match\": true,\n    \"address_match\": true\n  },\n  \"risk_factors_identified\": [],\n  \"recommendation_for_proceeding\": \"All documents have been successfully verified with high scores and consistent information. Proceed with confidence.\"\n}\n```\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"```json\\n{\\n  \\\"overall_verification_success_rate\\\": 100,\\n  \\\"consistency_across_documents\\\": {\\n    \\\"name_match\\\": true,\\n    \\\"address_match\\\": true\\n  },\\n  \\\"risk_factors_identified\\\": [],\\n  \\\"recommendation_for_proceeding\\\": \\\"All documents have been successfully verified with high scores and consistent information. Proceed with confidence.\\\"\\n}\\n```\", \"model_client_id\": \"underwriting_analyst\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
    "provider": "openai",
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "consolidate_document_verification"
  },
  "evaluate_default_risk": {
    "agent_type": "assistant",
    "ai_response": "To analyze the provided credit data and calculate the default risk, we will evaluate the various factors mentioned and assign a risk score based on the information available.\n\n### 1. Credit Score and History\n- **CIBIL Score**: The score is unresolved, which means we cannot assess the creditworthiness based on this metric. A low score typically indicates higher risk, while a high score indicates lower risk.\n- **Credit History**: The credit history is also unresolved. A good credit history would typically lower risk, while a poor history would increase it. \n\n### 2. Repayment Patterns\n- **Repayment Track Record**: The repayment track record is described as \"excellent.\" This indicates that the individual has consistently made payments on time, which is a positive factor in assessing default risk.\n\n### 3. Credit Utilization\n- **Loan Burden Ratio**: The loan burden ratio is 0.28 (28%), which is within a reasonable range. A lower ratio indicates that the individual is not over-leveraged and can manage their debts effectively. Generally, a ratio below 30% is considered good.\n\n### 4. Existing Loan Burden\n- **Total Monthly EMI**: The total monthly EMI is 7700.\n- **Outstanding Loans**: The total outstanding amount is 125,000, which includes:\n  - Personal Loan: 45,000 (EMI: 3500, Remaining Tenure: 18 months)\n  - Auto Loan: 80,000 (EMI: 4200, Remaining Tenure: 24 months)\n  \n  The existing loans are manageable given the excellent repayment track record.\n\n### 5. Overall Risk Profile\n- The individual has two loans with a total outstanding amount of 125,000 and a total monthly EMI of 7700. Given the loan burden ratio of 28% and an excellent repayment track record, the overall risk profile appears to be moderate to low. However, the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history create uncertainty.\n\n### Risk Score Calculation\nBased on the analysis:\n- **CIBIL Score**: Unknown (assumed average risk = 50)\n- **Credit History**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\n- **Repayment Patterns**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\n- **Credit Utilization**: 28% (low risk = 20)\n- **Existing Loan Burden**: Manageable (low risk = 20)\n\n### Risk Score Calculation\n- Average risk from CIBIL Score: 50\n- Excellent credit history: 20\n- Excellent repayment patterns: 20\n- Low credit utilization: 20\n- Manageable existing loan burden: 20\n\n**Total Risk Score = (50 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20) / 5 = 26**\n\n### Final Risk Score\n- **Risk Score**: 26 (on a scale of 1-100, where 100 is the highest risk)\n\n### Recommendations\n1. **Resolve CIBIL Score**: Obtain and resolve the CIBIL score to get a clearer picture of creditworthiness.\n2. **Maintain Excellent Repayment Patterns**: Continue the excellent repayment behavior to keep the risk low.\n3. **Monitor Credit Utilization**: Keep the loan burden ratio below 30% to maintain a healthy credit profile.\n4. **Consider Future Borrowing**: If additional loans are needed, ensure that the total EMI does not exceed 40% of monthly income to avoid over-leverage.\n5. **Regular Credit Report Checks**: Regularly check credit reports for errors or discrepancies that could affect the credit score.\n\nOverall, the individual appears to be at a low risk of default based on the available data, but the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history should be addressed for a more accurate assessment.",
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "agent_type": "assistant",
        "execution_details": {
          "agent_type": "assistant",
          "input_length": 561,
          "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
          "output_length": 3295,
          "provider": "openai",
          "system_message": "You are a credit risk assessment specialist. Analyze the provided credit data and calculate default risk.\n\nConsider:\n1. Credit score and history\n2. Repayment patterns\n3. Credit utilization\n4. Existing loan burden\n5. Overall risk profile\n\nProvide a risk score (1-100, where 100 is highest risk) and detailed risk analysis.\n"
        },
        "input_format": "json",
        "model_client_id": "risk_assessor",
        "output": "To analyze the provided credit data and calculate the default risk, we will evaluate the various factors mentioned and assign a risk score based on the information available.\n\n### 1. Credit Score and History\n- **CIBIL Score**: The score is unresolved, which means we cannot assess the creditworthiness based on this metric. A low score typically indicates higher risk, while a high score indicates lower risk.\n- **Credit History**: The credit history is also unresolved. A good credit history would typically lower risk, while a poor history would increase it. \n\n### 2. Repayment Patterns\n- **Repayment Track Record**: The repayment track record is described as \"excellent.\" This indicates that the individual has consistently made payments on time, which is a positive factor in assessing default risk.\n\n### 3. Credit Utilization\n- **Loan Burden Ratio**: The loan burden ratio is 0.28 (28%), which is within a reasonable range. A lower ratio indicates that the individual is not over-leveraged and can manage their debts effectively. Generally, a ratio below 30% is considered good.\n\n### 4. Existing Loan Burden\n- **Total Monthly EMI**: The total monthly EMI is 7700.\n- **Outstanding Loans**: The total outstanding amount is 125,000, which includes:\n  - Personal Loan: 45,000 (EMI: 3500, Remaining Tenure: 18 months)\n  - Auto Loan: 80,000 (EMI: 4200, Remaining Tenure: 24 months)\n  \n  The existing loans are manageable given the excellent repayment track record.\n\n### 5. Overall Risk Profile\n- The individual has two loans with a total outstanding amount of 125,000 and a total monthly EMI of 7700. Given the loan burden ratio of 28% and an excellent repayment track record, the overall risk profile appears to be moderate to low. However, the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history create uncertainty.\n\n### Risk Score Calculation\nBased on the analysis:\n- **CIBIL Score**: Unknown (assumed average risk = 50)\n- **Credit History**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\n- **Repayment Patterns**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\n- **Credit Utilization**: 28% (low risk = 20)\n- **Existing Loan Burden**: Manageable (low risk = 20)\n\n### Risk Score Calculation\n- Average risk from CIBIL Score: 50\n- Excellent credit history: 20\n- Excellent repayment patterns: 20\n- Low credit utilization: 20\n- Manageable existing loan burden: 20\n\n**Total Risk Score = (50 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20) / 5 = 26**\n\n### Final Risk Score\n- **Risk Score**: 26 (on a scale of 1-100, where 100 is the highest risk)\n\n### Recommendations\n1. **Resolve CIBIL Score**: Obtain and resolve the CIBIL score to get a clearer picture of creditworthiness.\n2. **Maintain Excellent Repayment Patterns**: Continue the excellent repayment behavior to keep the risk low.\n3. **Monitor Credit Utilization**: Keep the loan burden ratio below 30% to maintain a healthy credit profile.\n4. **Consider Future Borrowing**: If additional loans are needed, ensure that the total EMI does not exceed 40% of monthly income to avoid over-leverage.\n5. **Regular Credit Report Checks**: Regularly check credit reports for errors or discrepancies that could affect the credit score.\n\nOverall, the individual appears to be at a low risk of default based on the available data, but the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history should be addressed for a more accurate assessment.\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"To analyze the provided credit data and calculate the default risk, we will evaluate the various factors mentioned and assign a risk score based on the information available.\\n\\n### 1. Credit Score and History\\n- **CIBIL Score**: The score is unresolved, which means we cannot assess the creditworthiness based on this metric. A low score typically indicates higher risk, while a high score indicates lower risk.\\n- **Credit History**: The credit history is also unresolved. A good credit history would typically lower risk, while a poor history would increase it. \\n\\n### 2. Repayment Patterns\\n- **Repayment Track Record**: The repayment track record is described as \\\"excellent.\\\" This indicates that the individual has consistently made payments on time, which is a positive factor in assessing default risk.\\n\\n### 3. Credit Utilization\\n- **Loan Burden Ratio**: The loan burden ratio is 0.28 (28%), which is within a reasonable range. A lower ratio indicates that the individual is not over-leveraged and can manage their debts effectively. Generally, a ratio below 30% is considered good.\\n\\n### 4. Existing Loan Burden\\n- **Total Monthly EMI**: The total monthly EMI is 7700.\\n- **Outstanding Loans**: The total outstanding amount is 125,000, which includes:\\n  - Personal Loan: 45,000 (EMI: 3500, Remaining Tenure: 18 months)\\n  - Auto Loan: 80,000 (EMI: 4200, Remaining Tenure: 24 months)\\n  \\n  The existing loans are manageable given the excellent repayment track record.\\n\\n### 5. Overall Risk Profile\\n- The individual has two loans with a total outstanding amount of 125,000 and a total monthly EMI of 7700. Given the loan burden ratio of 28% and an excellent repayment track record, the overall risk profile appears to be moderate to low. However, the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history create uncertainty.\\n\\n### Risk Score Calculation\\nBased on the analysis:\\n- **CIBIL Score**: Unknown (assumed average risk = 50)\\n- **Credit History**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\\n- **Repayment Patterns**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\\n- **Credit Utilization**: 28% (low risk = 20)\\n- **Existing Loan Burden**: Manageable (low risk = 20)\\n\\n### Risk Score Calculation\\n- Average risk from CIBIL Score: 50\\n- Excellent credit history: 20\\n- Excellent repayment patterns: 20\\n- Low credit utilization: 20\\n- Manageable existing loan burden: 20\\n\\n**Total Risk Score = (50 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20) / 5 = 26**\\n\\n### Final Risk Score\\n- **Risk Score**: 26 (on a scale of 1-100, where 100 is the highest risk)\\n\\n### Recommendations\\n1. **Resolve CIBIL Score**: Obtain and resolve the CIBIL score to get a clearer picture of creditworthiness.\\n2. **Maintain Excellent Repayment Patterns**: Continue the excellent repayment behavior to keep the risk low.\\n3. **Monitor Credit Utilization**: Keep the loan burden ratio below 30% to maintain a healthy credit profile.\\n4. **Consider Future Borrowing**: If additional loans are needed, ensure that the total EMI does not exceed 40% of monthly income to avoid over-leverage.\\n5. **Regular Credit Report Checks**: Regularly check credit reports for errors or discrepancies that could affect the credit score.\\n\\nOverall, the individual appears to be at a low risk of default based on the available data, but the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history should be addressed for a more accurate assessment.\", \"model_client_id\": \"risk_assessor\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
        "output_format": "json",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 26.570807,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:57.170761",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.599954",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:36:57.170761",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
    "model_client_id": "risk_assessor",
    "output": "To analyze the provided credit data and calculate the default risk, we will evaluate the various factors mentioned and assign a risk score based on the information available.\n\n### 1. Credit Score and History\n- **CIBIL Score**: The score is unresolved, which means we cannot assess the creditworthiness based on this metric. A low score typically indicates higher risk, while a high score indicates lower risk.\n- **Credit History**: The credit history is also unresolved. A good credit history would typically lower risk, while a poor history would increase it. \n\n### 2. Repayment Patterns\n- **Repayment Track Record**: The repayment track record is described as \"excellent.\" This indicates that the individual has consistently made payments on time, which is a positive factor in assessing default risk.\n\n### 3. Credit Utilization\n- **Loan Burden Ratio**: The loan burden ratio is 0.28 (28%), which is within a reasonable range. A lower ratio indicates that the individual is not over-leveraged and can manage their debts effectively. Generally, a ratio below 30% is considered good.\n\n### 4. Existing Loan Burden\n- **Total Monthly EMI**: The total monthly EMI is 7700.\n- **Outstanding Loans**: The total outstanding amount is 125,000, which includes:\n  - Personal Loan: 45,000 (EMI: 3500, Remaining Tenure: 18 months)\n  - Auto Loan: 80,000 (EMI: 4200, Remaining Tenure: 24 months)\n  \n  The existing loans are manageable given the excellent repayment track record.\n\n### 5. Overall Risk Profile\n- The individual has two loans with a total outstanding amount of 125,000 and a total monthly EMI of 7700. Given the loan burden ratio of 28% and an excellent repayment track record, the overall risk profile appears to be moderate to low. However, the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history create uncertainty.\n\n### Risk Score Calculation\nBased on the analysis:\n- **CIBIL Score**: Unknown (assumed average risk = 50)\n- **Credit History**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\n- **Repayment Patterns**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\n- **Credit Utilization**: 28% (low risk = 20)\n- **Existing Loan Burden**: Manageable (low risk = 20)\n\n### Risk Score Calculation\n- Average risk from CIBIL Score: 50\n- Excellent credit history: 20\n- Excellent repayment patterns: 20\n- Low credit utilization: 20\n- Manageable existing loan burden: 20\n\n**Total Risk Score = (50 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20) / 5 = 26**\n\n### Final Risk Score\n- **Risk Score**: 26 (on a scale of 1-100, where 100 is the highest risk)\n\n### Recommendations\n1. **Resolve CIBIL Score**: Obtain and resolve the CIBIL score to get a clearer picture of creditworthiness.\n2. **Maintain Excellent Repayment Patterns**: Continue the excellent repayment behavior to keep the risk low.\n3. **Monitor Credit Utilization**: Keep the loan burden ratio below 30% to maintain a healthy credit profile.\n4. **Consider Future Borrowing**: If additional loans are needed, ensure that the total EMI does not exceed 40% of monthly income to avoid over-leverage.\n5. **Regular Credit Report Checks**: Regularly check credit reports for errors or discrepancies that could affect the credit score.\n\nOverall, the individual appears to be at a low risk of default based on the available data, but the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history should be addressed for a more accurate assessment.\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"To analyze the provided credit data and calculate the default risk, we will evaluate the various factors mentioned and assign a risk score based on the information available.\\n\\n### 1. Credit Score and History\\n- **CIBIL Score**: The score is unresolved, which means we cannot assess the creditworthiness based on this metric. A low score typically indicates higher risk, while a high score indicates lower risk.\\n- **Credit History**: The credit history is also unresolved. A good credit history would typically lower risk, while a poor history would increase it. \\n\\n### 2. Repayment Patterns\\n- **Repayment Track Record**: The repayment track record is described as \\\"excellent.\\\" This indicates that the individual has consistently made payments on time, which is a positive factor in assessing default risk.\\n\\n### 3. Credit Utilization\\n- **Loan Burden Ratio**: The loan burden ratio is 0.28 (28%), which is within a reasonable range. A lower ratio indicates that the individual is not over-leveraged and can manage their debts effectively. Generally, a ratio below 30% is considered good.\\n\\n### 4. Existing Loan Burden\\n- **Total Monthly EMI**: The total monthly EMI is 7700.\\n- **Outstanding Loans**: The total outstanding amount is 125,000, which includes:\\n  - Personal Loan: 45,000 (EMI: 3500, Remaining Tenure: 18 months)\\n  - Auto Loan: 80,000 (EMI: 4200, Remaining Tenure: 24 months)\\n  \\n  The existing loans are manageable given the excellent repayment track record.\\n\\n### 5. Overall Risk Profile\\n- The individual has two loans with a total outstanding amount of 125,000 and a total monthly EMI of 7700. Given the loan burden ratio of 28% and an excellent repayment track record, the overall risk profile appears to be moderate to low. However, the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history create uncertainty.\\n\\n### Risk Score Calculation\\nBased on the analysis:\\n- **CIBIL Score**: Unknown (assumed average risk = 50)\\n- **Credit History**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\\n- **Repayment Patterns**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\\n- **Credit Utilization**: 28% (low risk = 20)\\n- **Existing Loan Burden**: Manageable (low risk = 20)\\n\\n### Risk Score Calculation\\n- Average risk from CIBIL Score: 50\\n- Excellent credit history: 20\\n- Excellent repayment patterns: 20\\n- Low credit utilization: 20\\n- Manageable existing loan burden: 20\\n\\n**Total Risk Score = (50 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20) / 5 = 26**\\n\\n### Final Risk Score\\n- **Risk Score**: 26 (on a scale of 1-100, where 100 is the highest risk)\\n\\n### Recommendations\\n1. **Resolve CIBIL Score**: Obtain and resolve the CIBIL score to get a clearer picture of creditworthiness.\\n2. **Maintain Excellent Repayment Patterns**: Continue the excellent repayment behavior to keep the risk low.\\n3. **Monitor Credit Utilization**: Keep the loan burden ratio below 30% to maintain a healthy credit profile.\\n4. **Consider Future Borrowing**: If additional loans are needed, ensure that the total EMI does not exceed 40% of monthly income to avoid over-leverage.\\n5. **Regular Credit Report Checks**: Regularly check credit reports for errors or discrepancies that could affect the credit score.\\n\\nOverall, the individual appears to be at a low risk of default based on the available data, but the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history should be addressed for a more accurate assessment.\", \"model_client_id\": \"risk_assessor\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
    "provider": "openai",
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "evaluate_default_risk"
  },
  "execution_summary": {
    "completed_tasks": 24,
    "dependencies_detected": false,
    "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:46:08.482326",
    "execution_mode": "distributed",
    "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:08.031047",
    "total_tasks": 28
  },
  "extract_application_info": {
    "customer_info": {
      "address": "123 Main St, City, State 12345",
      "annual_income": 75000,
      "customer_id": "CUST_12345",
      "email": "john.doe@email.com",
      "employment_status": "employed",
      "full_name": "John Doe",
      "loan_purpose": "home_purchase",
      "phone": "+1-555-0123",
      "requested_amount": 1000
    },
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"extraction_success\": true, \"customer_info\": {\"customer_id\": \"CUST_12345\", \"full_name\": \"John Doe\", \"email\": \"john.doe@email.com\", \"phone\": \"+1-555-0123\", \"address\": \"123 Main St, City, State 12345\", \"employment_status\": \"employed\", \"annual_income\": 75000, \"loan_purpose\": \"home_purchase\", \"requested_amount\": 1000}, \"missing_fields\": []}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.276795,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:09.566068",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:09.289273",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:09.566068",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "extraction_success": true,
    "missing_fields": [],
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"extraction_success\": true, \"customer_info\": {\"customer_id\": \"CUST_12345\", \"full_name\": \"John Doe\", \"email\": \"john.doe@email.com\", \"phone\": \"+1-555-0123\", \"address\": \"123 Main St, City, State 12345\", \"employment_status\": \"employed\", \"annual_income\": 75000, \"loan_purpose\": \"home_purchase\", \"requested_amount\": 1000}, \"missing_fields\": []}\n",
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "extract_application_info"
  },
  "final_underwriting_analysis": {
    "agent_type": "assistant",
    "ai_response": "1. **Final Recommendation**: DECLINE\n\n2. **Loan Terms and Conditions**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\n\n3. **Risk Mitigation Measures**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\n\n4. **Reasoning for Decision**: The decision to decline the loan application is based on multiple unresolved assessments that are critical to determining the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile. Specifically, the following factors were noted:\n\n   - **Application Quality**: The unresolved application quality check raises concerns about the completeness and accuracy of the information provided by the applicant. Without a thorough review of the application quality, it is difficult to ascertain the reliability of the applicant\u0027s information.\n   \n   - **Document Verification**: The unresolved document verification indicates that necessary documentation has not been adequately verified. This is a significant red flag, as it prevents us from confirming the applicant\u0027s identity, income, and other critical factors.\n   \n   - **Income Assessment**: An unresolved income assessment means we cannot accurately evaluate the applicant\u0027s ability to repay the loan. This is a fundamental aspect of underwriting, and without this information, we cannot proceed.\n   \n   - **Credit Score**: The unresolved credit score calculation means we lack insight into the applicant\u0027s creditworthiness. A credit score is a key indicator of the likelihood of default, and without it, we cannot assess the risk appropriately.\n   \n   - **Default Risk**: The unresolved evaluation of default risk further complicates the decision-making process. Without understanding the potential for default, we cannot make an informed decision regarding the loan.\n   \n   - **Compliance**: The unresolved compliance consolidation indicates that there may be regulatory or legal issues that have not been addressed. Compliance is critical in underwriting, and any unresolved issues could expose the lender to legal risks.\n   \n   - **Debt-to-Income Ratio**: The unresolved calculation of the debt-to-income ratio means we cannot assess the applicant\u0027s financial health and ability to manage additional debt. This is essential for understanding the applicant\u0027s overall financial situation.\n\nGiven these unresolved issues, the risk associated with this loan application is too high, and we cannot proceed with approval. \n\n5. **Confidence Level**: 95\n\nThe confidence level is high due to the clear and significant unresolved issues that prevent a thorough assessment of the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile.",
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "agent_type": "assistant",
        "execution_details": {
          "agent_type": "assistant",
          "input_length": 484,
          "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
          "output_length": 2554,
          "provider": "openai",
          "system_message": "You are a senior underwriting manager making final loan decisions.\n\nAnalyze all assessment results and provide:\n1. Final recommendation (APPROVE/CONDITIONAL/DECLINE)\n2. Loan terms and conditions\n3. Risk mitigation measures\n4. Reasoning for decision\n5. Confidence level (1-100)\n\nConsider all factors: income, credit, compliance, and overall risk profile.\n"
        },
        "input_format": "json",
        "model_client_id": "underwriting_analyst",
        "output": "1. **Final Recommendation**: DECLINE\n\n2. **Loan Terms and Conditions**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\n\n3. **Risk Mitigation Measures**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\n\n4. **Reasoning for Decision**: The decision to decline the loan application is based on multiple unresolved assessments that are critical to determining the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile. Specifically, the following factors were noted:\n\n   - **Application Quality**: The unresolved application quality check raises concerns about the completeness and accuracy of the information provided by the applicant. Without a thorough review of the application quality, it is difficult to ascertain the reliability of the applicant\u0027s information.\n   \n   - **Document Verification**: The unresolved document verification indicates that necessary documentation has not been adequately verified. This is a significant red flag, as it prevents us from confirming the applicant\u0027s identity, income, and other critical factors.\n   \n   - **Income Assessment**: An unresolved income assessment means we cannot accurately evaluate the applicant\u0027s ability to repay the loan. This is a fundamental aspect of underwriting, and without this information, we cannot proceed.\n   \n   - **Credit Score**: The unresolved credit score calculation means we lack insight into the applicant\u0027s creditworthiness. A credit score is a key indicator of the likelihood of default, and without it, we cannot assess the risk appropriately.\n   \n   - **Default Risk**: The unresolved evaluation of default risk further complicates the decision-making process. Without understanding the potential for default, we cannot make an informed decision regarding the loan.\n   \n   - **Compliance**: The unresolved compliance consolidation indicates that there may be regulatory or legal issues that have not been addressed. Compliance is critical in underwriting, and any unresolved issues could expose the lender to legal risks.\n   \n   - **Debt-to-Income Ratio**: The unresolved calculation of the debt-to-income ratio means we cannot assess the applicant\u0027s financial health and ability to manage additional debt. This is essential for understanding the applicant\u0027s overall financial situation.\n\nGiven these unresolved issues, the risk associated with this loan application is too high, and we cannot proceed with approval. \n\n5. **Confidence Level**: 95\n\nThe confidence level is high due to the clear and significant unresolved issues that prevent a thorough assessment of the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile.\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"1. **Final Recommendation**: DECLINE\\n\\n2. **Loan Terms and Conditions**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\\n\\n3. **Risk Mitigation Measures**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\\n\\n4. **Reasoning for Decision**: The decision to decline the loan application is based on multiple unresolved assessments that are critical to determining the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile. Specifically, the following factors were noted:\\n\\n   - **Application Quality**: The unresolved application quality check raises concerns about the completeness and accuracy of the information provided by the applicant. Without a thorough review of the application quality, it is difficult to ascertain the reliability of the applicant\u0027s information.\\n   \\n   - **Document Verification**: The unresolved document verification indicates that necessary documentation has not been adequately verified. This is a significant red flag, as it prevents us from confirming the applicant\u0027s identity, income, and other critical factors.\\n   \\n   - **Income Assessment**: An unresolved income assessment means we cannot accurately evaluate the applicant\u0027s ability to repay the loan. This is a fundamental aspect of underwriting, and without this information, we cannot proceed.\\n   \\n   - **Credit Score**: The unresolved credit score calculation means we lack insight into the applicant\u0027s creditworthiness. A credit score is a key indicator of the likelihood of default, and without it, we cannot assess the risk appropriately.\\n   \\n   - **Default Risk**: The unresolved evaluation of default risk further complicates the decision-making process. Without understanding the potential for default, we cannot make an informed decision regarding the loan.\\n   \\n   - **Compliance**: The unresolved compliance consolidation indicates that there may be regulatory or legal issues that have not been addressed. Compliance is critical in underwriting, and any unresolved issues could expose the lender to legal risks.\\n   \\n   - **Debt-to-Income Ratio**: The unresolved calculation of the debt-to-income ratio means we cannot assess the applicant\u0027s financial health and ability to manage additional debt. This is essential for understanding the applicant\u0027s overall financial situation.\\n\\nGiven these unresolved issues, the risk associated with this loan application is too high, and we cannot proceed with approval. \\n\\n5. **Confidence Level**: 95\\n\\nThe confidence level is high due to the clear and significant unresolved issues that prevent a thorough assessment of the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile.\", \"model_client_id\": \"underwriting_analyst\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
        "output_format": "json",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 9.077867,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:40:09.608167",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:40:00.530300",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:40:09.608167",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
    "model_client_id": "underwriting_analyst",
    "output": "1. **Final Recommendation**: DECLINE\n\n2. **Loan Terms and Conditions**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\n\n3. **Risk Mitigation Measures**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\n\n4. **Reasoning for Decision**: The decision to decline the loan application is based on multiple unresolved assessments that are critical to determining the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile. Specifically, the following factors were noted:\n\n   - **Application Quality**: The unresolved application quality check raises concerns about the completeness and accuracy of the information provided by the applicant. Without a thorough review of the application quality, it is difficult to ascertain the reliability of the applicant\u0027s information.\n   \n   - **Document Verification**: The unresolved document verification indicates that necessary documentation has not been adequately verified. This is a significant red flag, as it prevents us from confirming the applicant\u0027s identity, income, and other critical factors.\n   \n   - **Income Assessment**: An unresolved income assessment means we cannot accurately evaluate the applicant\u0027s ability to repay the loan. This is a fundamental aspect of underwriting, and without this information, we cannot proceed.\n   \n   - **Credit Score**: The unresolved credit score calculation means we lack insight into the applicant\u0027s creditworthiness. A credit score is a key indicator of the likelihood of default, and without it, we cannot assess the risk appropriately.\n   \n   - **Default Risk**: The unresolved evaluation of default risk further complicates the decision-making process. Without understanding the potential for default, we cannot make an informed decision regarding the loan.\n   \n   - **Compliance**: The unresolved compliance consolidation indicates that there may be regulatory or legal issues that have not been addressed. Compliance is critical in underwriting, and any unresolved issues could expose the lender to legal risks.\n   \n   - **Debt-to-Income Ratio**: The unresolved calculation of the debt-to-income ratio means we cannot assess the applicant\u0027s financial health and ability to manage additional debt. This is essential for understanding the applicant\u0027s overall financial situation.\n\nGiven these unresolved issues, the risk associated with this loan application is too high, and we cannot proceed with approval. \n\n5. **Confidence Level**: 95\n\nThe confidence level is high due to the clear and significant unresolved issues that prevent a thorough assessment of the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile.\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"1. **Final Recommendation**: DECLINE\\n\\n2. **Loan Terms and Conditions**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\\n\\n3. **Risk Mitigation Measures**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\\n\\n4. **Reasoning for Decision**: The decision to decline the loan application is based on multiple unresolved assessments that are critical to determining the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile. Specifically, the following factors were noted:\\n\\n   - **Application Quality**: The unresolved application quality check raises concerns about the completeness and accuracy of the information provided by the applicant. Without a thorough review of the application quality, it is difficult to ascertain the reliability of the applicant\u0027s information.\\n   \\n   - **Document Verification**: The unresolved document verification indicates that necessary documentation has not been adequately verified. This is a significant red flag, as it prevents us from confirming the applicant\u0027s identity, income, and other critical factors.\\n   \\n   - **Income Assessment**: An unresolved income assessment means we cannot accurately evaluate the applicant\u0027s ability to repay the loan. This is a fundamental aspect of underwriting, and without this information, we cannot proceed.\\n   \\n   - **Credit Score**: The unresolved credit score calculation means we lack insight into the applicant\u0027s creditworthiness. A credit score is a key indicator of the likelihood of default, and without it, we cannot assess the risk appropriately.\\n   \\n   - **Default Risk**: The unresolved evaluation of default risk further complicates the decision-making process. Without understanding the potential for default, we cannot make an informed decision regarding the loan.\\n   \\n   - **Compliance**: The unresolved compliance consolidation indicates that there may be regulatory or legal issues that have not been addressed. Compliance is critical in underwriting, and any unresolved issues could expose the lender to legal risks.\\n   \\n   - **Debt-to-Income Ratio**: The unresolved calculation of the debt-to-income ratio means we cannot assess the applicant\u0027s financial health and ability to manage additional debt. This is essential for understanding the applicant\u0027s overall financial situation.\\n\\nGiven these unresolved issues, the risk associated with this loan application is too high, and we cannot proceed with approval. \\n\\n5. **Confidence Level**: 95\\n\\nThe confidence level is high due to the clear and significant unresolved issues that prevent a thorough assessment of the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile.\", \"model_client_id\": \"underwriting_analyst\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
    "provider": "openai",
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "final_underwriting_analysis"
  },
  "flag_for_manual_review": {
    "error": "Unsupported task type: human",
    "execution_details": {
      "failed": true,
      "message_sent": true,
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "output": "Task failed: Unsupported task type: human",
    "status": "FAILED",
    "task_id": "flag_for_manual_review"
  },
  "generate_final_output": {
    "error": "Python script failed with return code 1: Traceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"/tmp/tmp3k60_q0s.py\", line 15, in \u003cmodule\u003e\n    \"credit_score\": UNRESOLVED_calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score,\n                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nNameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_calculate_credit_score\u0027 is not defined\n",
    "execution_details": {
      "failed": true,
      "message_sent": true,
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "output": "Task failed: Python script failed with return code 1: Traceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"/tmp/tmp3k60_q0s.py\", line 15, in \u003cmodule\u003e\n    \"credit_score\": UNRESOLVED_calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score,\n                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nNameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_calculate_credit_score\u0027 is not defined\n",
    "status": "FAILED",
    "task_id": "generate_final_output"
  },
  "income_assessment": {
    "agent_type": "assistant",
    "ai_response": "Based on the provided income data and the context of the analysis, here is a detailed JSON assessment:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"income_assessment\": {\n    \"income_stability\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"High\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"employment_type\": \"Permanent\",\n        \"job_stability_score\": 88.5,\n        \"employer_rating\": \"A+\",\n        \"probation_status\": \"Confirmed\",\n        \"employment_verified\": true\n      }\n    },\n    \"debt_servicing_capability\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Unable to assess due to calculation error\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"debt_to_income_calculation\": {\n          \"error\": \"Python script failed with return code 1\",\n          \"error_message\": \"NameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_variables\u0027 is not defined\"\n        }\n      }\n    },\n    \"financial_discipline\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Pending further analysis\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"bank_statement_analysis\": \"UNRESOLVED_analyze_bank_statements\",\n        \"salary_analysis\": \"UNRESOLVED_analyze_salary_slips\",\n        \"tax_returns\": \"UNRESOLVED_verify_tax_returns\"\n      }\n    },\n    \"risk_factors\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Moderate\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"employment_stability\": \"High, but dependent on further financial data\",\n        \"debt_servicing\": \"Unknown due to unresolved calculations\",\n        \"financial_discipline\": \"Pending further verification\"\n      }\n    },\n    \"recommendations\": {\n      \"1\": \"Resolve the issues with the debt-to-income calculation to assess debt servicing capability.\",\n      \"2\": \"Conduct a thorough review of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns for a complete financial picture.\",\n      \"3\": \"Consider additional verification of income sources if available.\"\n    },\n    \"overall_income_adequacy_score\": 75\n  }\n}\n```\n\n### Explanation of the Assessment:\n\n1. **Income Stability Assessment**: The employment details indicate a high level of job stability with a permanent position and a strong employer rating. The job stability score of 88.5 further supports this assessment.\n\n2. **Debt Servicing Capability**: Unfortunately, the debt-to-income calculation could not be completed due to a script error. This prevents a full assessment of the individual\u0027s ability to service debt.\n\n3. **Financial Discipline Evaluation**: The financial discipline evaluation is pending as the necessary analyses of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns have not been resolved.\n\n4. **Risk Factors and Recommendations**: The risk factors are assessed as moderate due to the unknowns in debt servicing and financial discipline. Recommendations include resolving the calculation issues and conducting further financial reviews.\n\n5. **Overall Income Adequacy Score**: Given the high employment stability but unresolved financial data, an overall score of 75 is assigned, indicating a generally adequate income situation but with significant areas needing clarification.",
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "agent_type": "assistant",
        "execution_details": {
          "agent_type": "assistant",
          "input_length": 863,
          "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
          "output_length": 2871,
          "provider": "openai",
          "system_message": "You are a senior financial analyst specializing in income assessment for loan underwriting.\n\nAnalyze the provided income data and provide:\n1. Income stability assessment\n2. Debt servicing capability\n3. Financial discipline evaluation\n4. Risk factors and recommendations\n5. Overall income adequacy score (1-100)\n\nReturn a detailed JSON assessment.\n"
        },
        "input_format": "json",
        "model_client_id": "underwriting_analyst",
        "output": "Based on the provided income data and the context of the analysis, here is a detailed JSON assessment:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"income_assessment\": {\n    \"income_stability\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"High\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"employment_type\": \"Permanent\",\n        \"job_stability_score\": 88.5,\n        \"employer_rating\": \"A+\",\n        \"probation_status\": \"Confirmed\",\n        \"employment_verified\": true\n      }\n    },\n    \"debt_servicing_capability\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Unable to assess due to calculation error\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"debt_to_income_calculation\": {\n          \"error\": \"Python script failed with return code 1\",\n          \"error_message\": \"NameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_variables\u0027 is not defined\"\n        }\n      }\n    },\n    \"financial_discipline\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Pending further analysis\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"bank_statement_analysis\": \"UNRESOLVED_analyze_bank_statements\",\n        \"salary_analysis\": \"UNRESOLVED_analyze_salary_slips\",\n        \"tax_returns\": \"UNRESOLVED_verify_tax_returns\"\n      }\n    },\n    \"risk_factors\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Moderate\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"employment_stability\": \"High, but dependent on further financial data\",\n        \"debt_servicing\": \"Unknown due to unresolved calculations\",\n        \"financial_discipline\": \"Pending further verification\"\n      }\n    },\n    \"recommendations\": {\n      \"1\": \"Resolve the issues with the debt-to-income calculation to assess debt servicing capability.\",\n      \"2\": \"Conduct a thorough review of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns for a complete financial picture.\",\n      \"3\": \"Consider additional verification of income sources if available.\"\n    },\n    \"overall_income_adequacy_score\": 75\n  }\n}\n```\n\n### Explanation of the Assessment:\n\n1. **Income Stability Assessment**: The employment details indicate a high level of job stability with a permanent position and a strong employer rating. The job stability score of 88.5 further supports this assessment.\n\n2. **Debt Servicing Capability**: Unfortunately, the debt-to-income calculation could not be completed due to a script error. This prevents a full assessment of the individual\u0027s ability to service debt.\n\n3. **Financial Discipline Evaluation**: The financial discipline evaluation is pending as the necessary analyses of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns have not been resolved.\n\n4. **Risk Factors and Recommendations**: The risk factors are assessed as moderate due to the unknowns in debt servicing and financial discipline. Recommendations include resolving the calculation issues and conducting further financial reviews.\n\n5. **Overall Income Adequacy Score**: Given the high employment stability but unresolved financial data, an overall score of 75 is assigned, indicating a generally adequate income situation but with significant areas needing clarification.\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"Based on the provided income data and the context of the analysis, here is a detailed JSON assessment:\\n\\n```json\\n{\\n  \\\"income_assessment\\\": {\\n    \\\"income_stability\\\": {\\n      \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"High\\\",\\n      \\\"details\\\": {\\n        \\\"employment_type\\\": \\\"Permanent\\\",\\n        \\\"job_stability_score\\\": 88.5,\\n        \\\"employer_rating\\\": \\\"A+\\\",\\n        \\\"probation_status\\\": \\\"Confirmed\\\",\\n        \\\"employment_verified\\\": true\\n      }\\n    },\\n    \\\"debt_servicing_capability\\\": {\\n      \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"Unable to assess due to calculation error\\\",\\n      \\\"details\\\": {\\n        \\\"debt_to_income_calculation\\\": {\\n          \\\"error\\\": \\\"Python script failed with return code 1\\\",\\n          \\\"error_message\\\": \\\"NameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_variables\u0027 is not defined\\\"\\n        }\\n      }\\n    },\\n    \\\"financial_discipline\\\": {\\n      \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"Pending further analysis\\\",\\n      \\\"details\\\": {\\n        \\\"bank_statement_analysis\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED_analyze_bank_statements\\\",\\n        \\\"salary_analysis\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED_analyze_salary_slips\\\",\\n        \\\"tax_returns\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED_verify_tax_returns\\\"\\n      }\\n    },\\n    \\\"risk_factors\\\": {\\n      \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"Moderate\\\",\\n      \\\"details\\\": {\\n        \\\"employment_stability\\\": \\\"High, but dependent on further financial data\\\",\\n        \\\"debt_servicing\\\": \\\"Unknown due to unresolved calculations\\\",\\n        \\\"financial_discipline\\\": \\\"Pending further verification\\\"\\n      }\\n    },\\n    \\\"recommendations\\\": {\\n      \\\"1\\\": \\\"Resolve the issues with the debt-to-income calculation to assess debt servicing capability.\\\",\\n      \\\"2\\\": \\\"Conduct a thorough review of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns for a complete financial picture.\\\",\\n      \\\"3\\\": \\\"Consider additional verification of income sources if available.\\\"\\n    },\\n    \\\"overall_income_adequacy_score\\\": 75\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\n### Explanation of the Assessment:\\n\\n1. **Income Stability Assessment**: The employment details indicate a high level of job stability with a permanent position and a strong employer rating. The job stability score of 88.5 further supports this assessment.\\n\\n2. **Debt Servicing Capability**: Unfortunately, the debt-to-income calculation could not be completed due to a script error. This prevents a full assessment of the individual\u0027s ability to service debt.\\n\\n3. **Financial Discipline Evaluation**: The financial discipline evaluation is pending as the necessary analyses of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns have not been resolved.\\n\\n4. **Risk Factors and Recommendations**: The risk factors are assessed as moderate due to the unknowns in debt servicing and financial discipline. Recommendations include resolving the calculation issues and conducting further financial reviews.\\n\\n5. **Overall Income Adequacy Score**: Given the high employment stability but unresolved financial data, an overall score of 75 is assigned, indicating a generally adequate income situation but with significant areas needing clarification.\", \"model_client_id\": \"underwriting_analyst\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
        "output_format": "json",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 11.932595,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.075665",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:18.143070",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.075665",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
    "model_client_id": "underwriting_analyst",
    "output": "Based on the provided income data and the context of the analysis, here is a detailed JSON assessment:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"income_assessment\": {\n    \"income_stability\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"High\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"employment_type\": \"Permanent\",\n        \"job_stability_score\": 88.5,\n        \"employer_rating\": \"A+\",\n        \"probation_status\": \"Confirmed\",\n        \"employment_verified\": true\n      }\n    },\n    \"debt_servicing_capability\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Unable to assess due to calculation error\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"debt_to_income_calculation\": {\n          \"error\": \"Python script failed with return code 1\",\n          \"error_message\": \"NameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_variables\u0027 is not defined\"\n        }\n      }\n    },\n    \"financial_discipline\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Pending further analysis\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"bank_statement_analysis\": \"UNRESOLVED_analyze_bank_statements\",\n        \"salary_analysis\": \"UNRESOLVED_analyze_salary_slips\",\n        \"tax_returns\": \"UNRESOLVED_verify_tax_returns\"\n      }\n    },\n    \"risk_factors\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Moderate\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"employment_stability\": \"High, but dependent on further financial data\",\n        \"debt_servicing\": \"Unknown due to unresolved calculations\",\n        \"financial_discipline\": \"Pending further verification\"\n      }\n    },\n    \"recommendations\": {\n      \"1\": \"Resolve the issues with the debt-to-income calculation to assess debt servicing capability.\",\n      \"2\": \"Conduct a thorough review of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns for a complete financial picture.\",\n      \"3\": \"Consider additional verification of income sources if available.\"\n    },\n    \"overall_income_adequacy_score\": 75\n  }\n}\n```\n\n### Explanation of the Assessment:\n\n1. **Income Stability Assessment**: The employment details indicate a high level of job stability with a permanent position and a strong employer rating. The job stability score of 88.5 further supports this assessment.\n\n2. **Debt Servicing Capability**: Unfortunately, the debt-to-income calculation could not be completed due to a script error. This prevents a full assessment of the individual\u0027s ability to service debt.\n\n3. **Financial Discipline Evaluation**: The financial discipline evaluation is pending as the necessary analyses of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns have not been resolved.\n\n4. **Risk Factors and Recommendations**: The risk factors are assessed as moderate due to the unknowns in debt servicing and financial discipline. Recommendations include resolving the calculation issues and conducting further financial reviews.\n\n5. **Overall Income Adequacy Score**: Given the high employment stability but unresolved financial data, an overall score of 75 is assigned, indicating a generally adequate income situation but with significant areas needing clarification.\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"Based on the provided income data and the context of the analysis, here is a detailed JSON assessment:\\n\\n```json\\n{\\n  \\\"income_assessment\\\": {\\n    \\\"income_stability\\\": {\\n      \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"High\\\",\\n      \\\"details\\\": {\\n        \\\"employment_type\\\": \\\"Permanent\\\",\\n        \\\"job_stability_score\\\": 88.5,\\n        \\\"employer_rating\\\": \\\"A+\\\",\\n        \\\"probation_status\\\": \\\"Confirmed\\\",\\n        \\\"employment_verified\\\": true\\n      }\\n    },\\n    \\\"debt_servicing_capability\\\": {\\n      \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"Unable to assess due to calculation error\\\",\\n      \\\"details\\\": {\\n        \\\"debt_to_income_calculation\\\": {\\n          \\\"error\\\": \\\"Python script failed with return code 1\\\",\\n          \\\"error_message\\\": \\\"NameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_variables\u0027 is not defined\\\"\\n        }\\n      }\\n    },\\n    \\\"financial_discipline\\\": {\\n      \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"Pending further analysis\\\",\\n      \\\"details\\\": {\\n        \\\"bank_statement_analysis\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED_analyze_bank_statements\\\",\\n        \\\"salary_analysis\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED_analyze_salary_slips\\\",\\n        \\\"tax_returns\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED_verify_tax_returns\\\"\\n      }\\n    },\\n    \\\"risk_factors\\\": {\\n      \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"Moderate\\\",\\n      \\\"details\\\": {\\n        \\\"employment_stability\\\": \\\"High, but dependent on further financial data\\\",\\n        \\\"debt_servicing\\\": \\\"Unknown due to unresolved calculations\\\",\\n        \\\"financial_discipline\\\": \\\"Pending further verification\\\"\\n      }\\n    },\\n    \\\"recommendations\\\": {\\n      \\\"1\\\": \\\"Resolve the issues with the debt-to-income calculation to assess debt servicing capability.\\\",\\n      \\\"2\\\": \\\"Conduct a thorough review of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns for a complete financial picture.\\\",\\n      \\\"3\\\": \\\"Consider additional verification of income sources if available.\\\"\\n    },\\n    \\\"overall_income_adequacy_score\\\": 75\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\n### Explanation of the Assessment:\\n\\n1. **Income Stability Assessment**: The employment details indicate a high level of job stability with a permanent position and a strong employer rating. The job stability score of 88.5 further supports this assessment.\\n\\n2. **Debt Servicing Capability**: Unfortunately, the debt-to-income calculation could not be completed due to a script error. This prevents a full assessment of the individual\u0027s ability to service debt.\\n\\n3. **Financial Discipline Evaluation**: The financial discipline evaluation is pending as the necessary analyses of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns have not been resolved.\\n\\n4. **Risk Factors and Recommendations**: The risk factors are assessed as moderate due to the unknowns in debt servicing and financial discipline. Recommendations include resolving the calculation issues and conducting further financial reviews.\\n\\n5. **Overall Income Adequacy Score**: Given the high employment stability but unresolved financial data, an overall score of 75 is assigned, indicating a generally adequate income situation but with significant areas needing clarification.\", \"model_client_id\": \"underwriting_analyst\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
    "provider": "openai",
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "income_assessment"
  },
  "internal_policy_check": {
    "age_criteria_met": true,
    "credit_score_threshold_met": true,
    "employment_criteria_met": true,
    "exceptions_required": [],
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"loan_amount_within_limits\": true, \"ltv_ratio_acceptable\": true, \"income_criteria_met\": true, \"age_criteria_met\": true, \"employment_criteria_met\": true, \"credit_score_threshold_met\": true, \"geographic_restrictions_met\": true, \"policy_compliance_score\": 95.5, \"exceptions_required\": [], \"policy_version\": \"2024.1\"}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.382864,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:57.242881",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.860017",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:39:57.242881",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "geographic_restrictions_met": true,
    "income_criteria_met": true,
    "loan_amount_within_limits": true,
    "ltv_ratio_acceptable": true,
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"loan_amount_within_limits\": true, \"ltv_ratio_acceptable\": true, \"income_criteria_met\": true, \"age_criteria_met\": true, \"employment_criteria_met\": true, \"credit_score_threshold_met\": true, \"geographic_restrictions_met\": true, \"policy_compliance_score\": 95.5, \"exceptions_required\": [], \"policy_version\": \"2024.1\"}\n",
    "policy_compliance_score": 95.5,
    "policy_version": "2024.1",
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "internal_policy_check"
  },
  "kyc_compliance_check": {
    "address_verified": true,
    "compliance_score": 98.5,
    "documents_complete": true,
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"kyc_status\": \"compliant\", \"identity_verified\": true, \"address_verified\": true, \"income_verified\": true, \"documents_complete\": true, \"risk_category\": \"low\", \"compliance_score\": 98.5, \"last_updated\": \"2024-07-15\", \"regulatory_requirements_met\": true}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.321735,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.364676",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.042941",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.364676",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "identity_verified": true,
    "income_verified": true,
    "kyc_status": "compliant",
    "last_updated": "2024-07-15",
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"kyc_status\": \"compliant\", \"identity_verified\": true, \"address_verified\": true, \"income_verified\": true, \"documents_complete\": true, \"risk_category\": \"low\", \"compliance_score\": 98.5, \"last_updated\": \"2024-07-15\", \"regulatory_requirements_met\": true}\n",
    "regulatory_requirements_met": true,
    "return_code": 0,
    "risk_category": "low",
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "kyc_compliance_check"
  },
  "regulatory_compliance": {
    "audit_trail_complete": true,
    "compliance_score": 97.2,
    "consumer_protection_compliant": true,
    "data_privacy_compliant": true,
    "disclosure_requirements_met": true,
    "documentation_complete": true,
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"rbi_guidelines_met\": true, \"lending_norms_compliant\": true, \"documentation_complete\": true, \"disclosure_requirements_met\": true, \"consumer_protection_compliant\": true, \"data_privacy_compliant\": true, \"compliance_score\": 97.2, \"audit_trail_complete\": true, \"regulatory_risk\": \"minimal\"}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.319946,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.908258",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.588312",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.908258",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "lending_norms_compliant": true,
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"rbi_guidelines_met\": true, \"lending_norms_compliant\": true, \"documentation_complete\": true, \"disclosure_requirements_met\": true, \"consumer_protection_compliant\": true, \"data_privacy_compliant\": true, \"compliance_score\": 97.2, \"audit_trail_complete\": true, \"regulatory_risk\": \"minimal\"}\n",
    "rbi_guidelines_met": true,
    "regulatory_risk": "minimal",
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "regulatory_compliance"
  },
  "status": "FAILED",
  "task_outputs": {
    "aml_screening": {
      "adverse_media": "no_hits",
      "aml_status": "cleared",
      "compliance_score": 96.8,
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"aml_status\": \"cleared\", \"watchlist_check\": \"no_matches\", \"pep_screening\": \"not_identified\", \"sanctions_check\": \"cleared\", \"adverse_media\": \"no_hits\", \"risk_rating\": \"low\", \"compliance_score\": 96.8, \"screening_date\": \"2024-07-15\", \"manual_review_required\": false}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.356123,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.641749",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.285626",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.641749",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "manual_review_required": false,
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"aml_status\": \"cleared\", \"watchlist_check\": \"no_matches\", \"pep_screening\": \"not_identified\", \"sanctions_check\": \"cleared\", \"adverse_media\": \"no_hits\", \"risk_rating\": \"low\", \"compliance_score\": 96.8, \"screening_date\": \"2024-07-15\", \"manual_review_required\": false}\n",
      "pep_screening": "not_identified",
      "return_code": 0,
      "risk_rating": "low",
      "sanctions_check": "cleared",
      "screening_date": "2024-07-15",
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "aml_screening",
      "watchlist_check": "no_matches"
    },
    "analyze_bank_statements": {
      "account_balance_trend": "stable",
      "average_monthly_credits": 7200,
      "bounced_transactions": 0,
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"average_monthly_credits\": 7200, \"salary_credits_consistent\": true, \"account_balance_trend\": \"stable\", \"minimum_balance\": 15000, \"maximum_balance\": 45000, \"bounced_transactions\": 0, \"loan_emis_detected\": 2, \"total_monthly_debits\": 5800, \"financial_discipline_score\": 85.5, \"irregular_transactions\": false}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.481695,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.755179",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.273484",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.755179",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "financial_discipline_score": 85.5,
      "irregular_transactions": false,
      "loan_emis_detected": 2,
      "maximum_balance": 45000,
      "minimum_balance": 15000,
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"average_monthly_credits\": 7200, \"salary_credits_consistent\": true, \"account_balance_trend\": \"stable\", \"minimum_balance\": 15000, \"maximum_balance\": 45000, \"bounced_transactions\": 0, \"loan_emis_detected\": 2, \"total_monthly_debits\": 5800, \"financial_discipline_score\": 85.5, \"irregular_transactions\": false}\n",
      "return_code": 0,
      "salary_credits_consistent": true,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "analyze_bank_statements",
      "total_monthly_debits": 5800
    },
    "analyze_credit_history": {
      "average_account_age": "32 months",
      "credit_limit_utilization": 35.2,
      "credit_mix": {
        "auto_loans": 1,
        "credit_cards": 3,
        "home_loans": 0,
        "other": 1,
        "personal_loans": 1
      },
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"oldest_account_age\": \"60 months\", \"average_account_age\": \"32 months\", \"credit_mix\": {\"credit_cards\": 3, \"personal_loans\": 1, \"auto_loans\": 1, \"home_loans\": 0, \"other\": 1}, \"repayment_behavior\": {\"never_missed\": 85.0, \"30_days_late\": 12.0, \"60_days_late\": 2.5, \"90_days_late\": 0.5, \"defaults\": 0.0}, \"credit_limit_utilization\": 35.2, \"recent_credit_behavior\": \"stable\"}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.392463,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.375201",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:29.982738",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.375201",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "oldest_account_age": "60 months",
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"oldest_account_age\": \"60 months\", \"average_account_age\": \"32 months\", \"credit_mix\": {\"credit_cards\": 3, \"personal_loans\": 1, \"auto_loans\": 1, \"home_loans\": 0, \"other\": 1}, \"repayment_behavior\": {\"never_missed\": 85.0, \"30_days_late\": 12.0, \"60_days_late\": 2.5, \"90_days_late\": 0.5, \"defaults\": 0.0}, \"credit_limit_utilization\": 35.2, \"recent_credit_behavior\": \"stable\"}\n",
      "recent_credit_behavior": "stable",
      "repayment_behavior": {
        "30_days_late": 12.0,
        "60_days_late": 2.5,
        "90_days_late": 0.5,
        "defaults": 0.0,
        "never_missed": 85.0
      },
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "analyze_credit_history"
    },
    "analyze_salary_slips": {
      "annual_gross": 102000,
      "annual_net": 81600,
      "deductions": {
        "insurance": 300,
        "pf": 500,
        "tax": 1200
      },
      "employer": "Tech Corp Ltd",
      "employment_duration": "2.5 years",
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"monthly_gross\": 8500, \"monthly_net\": 6800, \"annual_gross\": 102000, \"annual_net\": 81600, \"employer\": \"Tech Corp Ltd\", \"employment_duration\": \"2.5 years\", \"salary_consistency\": true, \"recent_increment\": true, \"deductions\": {\"tax\": 1200, \"pf\": 500, \"insurance\": 300}}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.333144,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.568852",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.235708",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.568852",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "monthly_gross": 8500,
      "monthly_net": 6800,
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"monthly_gross\": 8500, \"monthly_net\": 6800, \"annual_gross\": 102000, \"annual_net\": 81600, \"employer\": \"Tech Corp Ltd\", \"employment_duration\": \"2.5 years\", \"salary_consistency\": true, \"recent_increment\": true, \"deductions\": {\"tax\": 1200, \"pf\": 500, \"insurance\": 300}}\n",
      "recent_increment": true,
      "return_code": 0,
      "salary_consistency": true,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "analyze_salary_slips"
    },
    "application_quality_check": {
      "agent_type": "assistant",
      "ai_response": "```json\n{\n  \"data_completeness_and_accuracy\": {\n    \"missing_fields\": [],\n    \"validation_passed\": true,\n    \"completion_percentage\": 100.0,\n    \"assessment\": \"The application data is complete with no missing fields, and all provided information has passed validation checks.\"\n  },\n  \"consistency_of_information\": {\n    \"assessment\": \"Since there are no missing fields and the validation has passed, the information appears to be consistent. However, further details about the specific customer info would be needed to assess consistency in context.\"\n  },\n  \"red_flags_or_inconsistencies\": {\n    \"assessment\": \"No red flags or inconsistencies have been identified based on the provided validation results. However, a deeper review of the actual customer information would be necessary to identify any potential issues.\"\n  },\n  \"overall_application_quality_score\": 95,\n  \"overall_assessment\": \"The application is of high quality due to its completeness and successful validation. A score of 95 reflects the strong quality, but further context on the customer information would be needed for a perfect score.\"\n}\n```",
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "agent_type": "assistant",
          "execution_details": {
            "agent_type": "assistant",
            "input_length": 246,
            "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
            "output_length": 1113,
            "provider": "openai",
            "system_message": "You are an expert loan underwriting analyst. Review the application data and assess its quality.\n\nEvaluate:\n1. Data completeness and accuracy\n2. Consistency of information\n3. Red flags or inconsistencies\n4. Overall application quality score (1-100)\n\nReturn a JSON response with your assessment.\n"
          },
          "input_format": "json",
          "model_client_id": "underwriting_analyst",
          "output": "```json\n{\n  \"data_completeness_and_accuracy\": {\n    \"missing_fields\": [],\n    \"validation_passed\": true,\n    \"completion_percentage\": 100.0,\n    \"assessment\": \"The application data is complete with no missing fields, and all provided information has passed validation checks.\"\n  },\n  \"consistency_of_information\": {\n    \"assessment\": \"Since there are no missing fields and the validation has passed, the information appears to be consistent. However, further details about the specific customer info would be needed to assess consistency in context.\"\n  },\n  \"red_flags_or_inconsistencies\": {\n    \"assessment\": \"No red flags or inconsistencies have been identified based on the provided validation results. However, a deeper review of the actual customer information would be necessary to identify any potential issues.\"\n  },\n  \"overall_application_quality_score\": 95,\n  \"overall_assessment\": \"The application is of high quality due to its completeness and successful validation. A score of 95 reflects the strong quality, but further context on the customer information would be needed for a perfect score.\"\n}\n```\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"```json\\n{\\n  \\\"data_completeness_and_accuracy\\\": {\\n    \\\"missing_fields\\\": [],\\n    \\\"validation_passed\\\": true,\\n    \\\"completion_percentage\\\": 100.0,\\n    \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"The application data is complete with no missing fields, and all provided information has passed validation checks.\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"consistency_of_information\\\": {\\n    \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"Since there are no missing fields and the validation has passed, the information appears to be consistent. However, further details about the specific customer info would be needed to assess consistency in context.\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"red_flags_or_inconsistencies\\\": {\\n    \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"No red flags or inconsistencies have been identified based on the provided validation results. However, a deeper review of the actual customer information would be necessary to identify any potential issues.\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"overall_application_quality_score\\\": 95,\\n  \\\"overall_assessment\\\": \\\"The application is of high quality due to its completeness and successful validation. A score of 95 reflects the strong quality, but further context on the customer information would be needed for a perfect score.\\\"\\n}\\n```\", \"model_client_id\": \"underwriting_analyst\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
          "output_format": "json",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 5.466944,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:15.254208",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:09.787264",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:15.254208",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
      "model_client_id": "underwriting_analyst",
      "output": "```json\n{\n  \"data_completeness_and_accuracy\": {\n    \"missing_fields\": [],\n    \"validation_passed\": true,\n    \"completion_percentage\": 100.0,\n    \"assessment\": \"The application data is complete with no missing fields, and all provided information has passed validation checks.\"\n  },\n  \"consistency_of_information\": {\n    \"assessment\": \"Since there are no missing fields and the validation has passed, the information appears to be consistent. However, further details about the specific customer info would be needed to assess consistency in context.\"\n  },\n  \"red_flags_or_inconsistencies\": {\n    \"assessment\": \"No red flags or inconsistencies have been identified based on the provided validation results. However, a deeper review of the actual customer information would be necessary to identify any potential issues.\"\n  },\n  \"overall_application_quality_score\": 95,\n  \"overall_assessment\": \"The application is of high quality due to its completeness and successful validation. A score of 95 reflects the strong quality, but further context on the customer information would be needed for a perfect score.\"\n}\n```\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"```json\\n{\\n  \\\"data_completeness_and_accuracy\\\": {\\n    \\\"missing_fields\\\": [],\\n    \\\"validation_passed\\\": true,\\n    \\\"completion_percentage\\\": 100.0,\\n    \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"The application data is complete with no missing fields, and all provided information has passed validation checks.\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"consistency_of_information\\\": {\\n    \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"Since there are no missing fields and the validation has passed, the information appears to be consistent. However, further details about the specific customer info would be needed to assess consistency in context.\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"red_flags_or_inconsistencies\\\": {\\n    \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"No red flags or inconsistencies have been identified based on the provided validation results. However, a deeper review of the actual customer information would be necessary to identify any potential issues.\\\"\\n  },\\n  \\\"overall_application_quality_score\\\": 95,\\n  \\\"overall_assessment\\\": \\\"The application is of high quality due to its completeness and successful validation. A score of 95 reflects the strong quality, but further context on the customer information would be needed for a perfect score.\\\"\\n}\\n```\", \"model_client_id\": \"underwriting_analyst\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
      "provider": "openai",
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "application_quality_check"
    },
    "assess_existing_loans": {
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"total_outstanding\": 125000, \"number_of_loans\": 2, \"loan_details\": [{\"type\": \"personal_loan\", \"outstanding\": 45000, \"emi\": 3500, \"remaining_tenure\": \"18 months\"}, {\"type\": \"auto_loan\", \"outstanding\": 80000, \"emi\": 4200, \"remaining_tenure\": \"24 months\"}], \"total_monthly_emi\": 7700, \"repayment_track_record\": \"excellent\", \"loan_burden_ratio\": 0.28}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.316454,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.646978",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.330524",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.646978",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "loan_burden_ratio": 0.28,
      "loan_details": [
        {
          "emi": 3500,
          "outstanding": 45000,
          "remaining_tenure": "18 months",
          "type": "personal_loan"
        },
        {
          "emi": 4200,
          "outstanding": 80000,
          "remaining_tenure": "24 months",
          "type": "auto_loan"
        }
      ],
      "number_of_loans": 2,
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"total_outstanding\": 125000, \"number_of_loans\": 2, \"loan_details\": [{\"type\": \"personal_loan\", \"outstanding\": 45000, \"emi\": 3500, \"remaining_tenure\": \"18 months\"}, {\"type\": \"auto_loan\", \"outstanding\": 80000, \"emi\": 4200, \"remaining_tenure\": \"24 months\"}], \"total_monthly_emi\": 7700, \"repayment_track_record\": \"excellent\", \"loan_burden_ratio\": 0.28}\n",
      "repayment_track_record": "excellent",
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "assess_existing_loans",
      "total_monthly_emi": 7700,
      "total_outstanding": 125000
    },
    "calculate_credit_score": {
      "error": "Python script failed with return code 1: Traceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"/tmp/tmph0u0c611.py\", line 9, in \u003cmodule\u003e\n    cibil_score = UNRESOLVED_check_cibil_score.credit_score\n                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nNameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_check_cibil_score\u0027 is not defined\n",
      "execution_details": {
        "failed": true,
        "message_sent": true,
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "output": "Task failed: Python script failed with return code 1: Traceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"/tmp/tmph0u0c611.py\", line 9, in \u003cmodule\u003e\n    cibil_score = UNRESOLVED_check_cibil_score.credit_score\n                  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nNameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_check_cibil_score\u0027 is not defined\n",
      "status": "FAILED",
      "task_id": "calculate_credit_score"
    },
    "calculate_debt_to_income": {
      "error": "Python script failed with return code 1: Traceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"/tmp/tmp3kepdkrg.py\", line 20, in \u003cmodule\u003e\n    max_allowed_ratio = UNRESOLVED_variables.max_debt_to_income_ratio\n                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nNameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_variables\u0027 is not defined\n",
      "execution_details": {
        "failed": true,
        "message_sent": true,
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "output": "Task failed: Python script failed with return code 1: Traceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"/tmp/tmp3kepdkrg.py\", line 20, in \u003cmodule\u003e\n    max_allowed_ratio = UNRESOLVED_variables.max_debt_to_income_ratio\n                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nNameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_variables\u0027 is not defined\n",
      "status": "FAILED",
      "task_id": "calculate_debt_to_income"
    },
    "check_cibil_score": {
      "active_accounts": 6,
      "closed_accounts": 2,
      "credit_history_length": "5 years",
      "credit_score": 720,
      "credit_utilization": 35.5,
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"credit_score\": 720, \"score_range\": \"Good\", \"last_updated\": \"2024-06-01\", \"credit_history_length\": \"5 years\", \"total_accounts\": 8, \"active_accounts\": 6, \"closed_accounts\": 2, \"credit_utilization\": 35.5, \"payment_history\": \"99% on-time\", \"recent_inquiries\": 2}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.302929,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.040229",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:29.737300",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.040229",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "last_updated": "2024-06-01",
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"credit_score\": 720, \"score_range\": \"Good\", \"last_updated\": \"2024-06-01\", \"credit_history_length\": \"5 years\", \"total_accounts\": 8, \"active_accounts\": 6, \"closed_accounts\": 2, \"credit_utilization\": 35.5, \"payment_history\": \"99% on-time\", \"recent_inquiries\": 2}\n",
      "payment_history": "99% on-time",
      "recent_inquiries": 2,
      "return_code": 0,
      "score_range": "Good",
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "check_cibil_score",
      "total_accounts": 8
    },
    "compliance_consolidation": {
      "agent_type": "assistant",
      "ai_response": "```json\n{\n  \"overall_compliance_status\": \"Non-compliant\",\n  \"risk_assessment\": {\n    \"high_risk_areas\": [\n      \"KYC Compliance\",\n      \"AML Screening\",\n      \"Regulatory Compliance\"\n    ],\n    \"low_risk_areas\": [\n      \"Internal Policy\"\n    ]\n  },\n  \"compliance_gaps_or_concerns\": [\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"KYC Compliance\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Failure to meet Know Your Customer requirements can lead to identity fraud and regulatory penalties.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"AML Screening\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Inadequate Anti-Money Laundering screening increases the risk of financial crime.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"Regulatory Compliance\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Non-compliance with regulatory requirements can result in fines and legal action.\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"recommendations_for_proceeding\": [\n    \"Immediately address the unresolved KYC compliance issues by implementing a robust verification process.\",\n    \"Enhance AML screening procedures to ensure all transactions are monitored and flagged appropriately.\",\n    \"Conduct a thorough review of regulatory compliance requirements and rectify any outstanding issues.\",\n    \"Continue to maintain and monitor internal policy compliance, as it currently meets the necessary criteria.\"\n  ],\n  \"compliance_confidence_score\": 30\n}\n```",
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "agent_type": "assistant",
          "execution_details": {
            "agent_type": "assistant",
            "input_length": 571,
            "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
            "output_length": 1367,
            "provider": "openai",
            "system_message": "You are a compliance officer specializing in loan underwriting compliance.\n\nReview all compliance check results and provide:\n1. Overall compliance status\n2. Risk assessment\n3. Any compliance gaps or concerns\n4. Recommendations for proceeding\n5. Compliance confidence score (1-100)\n\nReturn a comprehensive compliance assessment in JSON format.\n"
          },
          "input_format": "json",
          "model_client_id": "compliance_reviewer",
          "output": "```json\n{\n  \"overall_compliance_status\": \"Non-compliant\",\n  \"risk_assessment\": {\n    \"high_risk_areas\": [\n      \"KYC Compliance\",\n      \"AML Screening\",\n      \"Regulatory Compliance\"\n    ],\n    \"low_risk_areas\": [\n      \"Internal Policy\"\n    ]\n  },\n  \"compliance_gaps_or_concerns\": [\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"KYC Compliance\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Failure to meet Know Your Customer requirements can lead to identity fraud and regulatory penalties.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"AML Screening\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Inadequate Anti-Money Laundering screening increases the risk of financial crime.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"Regulatory Compliance\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Non-compliance with regulatory requirements can result in fines and legal action.\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"recommendations_for_proceeding\": [\n    \"Immediately address the unresolved KYC compliance issues by implementing a robust verification process.\",\n    \"Enhance AML screening procedures to ensure all transactions are monitored and flagged appropriately.\",\n    \"Conduct a thorough review of regulatory compliance requirements and rectify any outstanding issues.\",\n    \"Continue to maintain and monitor internal policy compliance, as it currently meets the necessary criteria.\"\n  ],\n  \"compliance_confidence_score\": 30\n}\n```\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"```json\\n{\\n  \\\"overall_compliance_status\\\": \\\"Non-compliant\\\",\\n  \\\"risk_assessment\\\": {\\n    \\\"high_risk_areas\\\": [\\n      \\\"KYC Compliance\\\",\\n      \\\"AML Screening\\\",\\n      \\\"Regulatory Compliance\\\"\\n    ],\\n    \\\"low_risk_areas\\\": [\\n      \\\"Internal Policy\\\"\\n    ]\\n  },\\n  \\\"compliance_gaps_or_concerns\\\": [\\n    {\\n      \\\"issue\\\": \\\"KYC Compliance\\\",\\n      \\\"status\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED\\\",\\n      \\\"concern\\\": \\\"Failure to meet Know Your Customer requirements can lead to identity fraud and regulatory penalties.\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"issue\\\": \\\"AML Screening\\\",\\n      \\\"status\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED\\\",\\n      \\\"concern\\\": \\\"Inadequate Anti-Money Laundering screening increases the risk of financial crime.\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"issue\\\": \\\"Regulatory Compliance\\\",\\n      \\\"status\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED\\\",\\n      \\\"concern\\\": \\\"Non-compliance with regulatory requirements can result in fines and legal action.\\\"\\n    }\\n  ],\\n  \\\"recommendations_for_proceeding\\\": [\\n    \\\"Immediately address the unresolved KYC compliance issues by implementing a robust verification process.\\\",\\n    \\\"Enhance AML screening procedures to ensure all transactions are monitored and flagged appropriately.\\\",\\n    \\\"Conduct a thorough review of regulatory compliance requirements and rectify any outstanding issues.\\\",\\n    \\\"Continue to maintain and monitor internal policy compliance, as it currently meets the necessary criteria.\\\"\\n  ],\\n  \\\"compliance_confidence_score\\\": 30\\n}\\n```\", \"model_client_id\": \"compliance_reviewer\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
          "output_format": "json",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 6.413679,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:40:03.605586",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:57.191907",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:40:03.605586",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
      "model_client_id": "compliance_reviewer",
      "output": "```json\n{\n  \"overall_compliance_status\": \"Non-compliant\",\n  \"risk_assessment\": {\n    \"high_risk_areas\": [\n      \"KYC Compliance\",\n      \"AML Screening\",\n      \"Regulatory Compliance\"\n    ],\n    \"low_risk_areas\": [\n      \"Internal Policy\"\n    ]\n  },\n  \"compliance_gaps_or_concerns\": [\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"KYC Compliance\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Failure to meet Know Your Customer requirements can lead to identity fraud and regulatory penalties.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"AML Screening\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Inadequate Anti-Money Laundering screening increases the risk of financial crime.\"\n    },\n    {\n      \"issue\": \"Regulatory Compliance\",\n      \"status\": \"UNRESOLVED\",\n      \"concern\": \"Non-compliance with regulatory requirements can result in fines and legal action.\"\n    }\n  ],\n  \"recommendations_for_proceeding\": [\n    \"Immediately address the unresolved KYC compliance issues by implementing a robust verification process.\",\n    \"Enhance AML screening procedures to ensure all transactions are monitored and flagged appropriately.\",\n    \"Conduct a thorough review of regulatory compliance requirements and rectify any outstanding issues.\",\n    \"Continue to maintain and monitor internal policy compliance, as it currently meets the necessary criteria.\"\n  ],\n  \"compliance_confidence_score\": 30\n}\n```\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"```json\\n{\\n  \\\"overall_compliance_status\\\": \\\"Non-compliant\\\",\\n  \\\"risk_assessment\\\": {\\n    \\\"high_risk_areas\\\": [\\n      \\\"KYC Compliance\\\",\\n      \\\"AML Screening\\\",\\n      \\\"Regulatory Compliance\\\"\\n    ],\\n    \\\"low_risk_areas\\\": [\\n      \\\"Internal Policy\\\"\\n    ]\\n  },\\n  \\\"compliance_gaps_or_concerns\\\": [\\n    {\\n      \\\"issue\\\": \\\"KYC Compliance\\\",\\n      \\\"status\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED\\\",\\n      \\\"concern\\\": \\\"Failure to meet Know Your Customer requirements can lead to identity fraud and regulatory penalties.\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"issue\\\": \\\"AML Screening\\\",\\n      \\\"status\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED\\\",\\n      \\\"concern\\\": \\\"Inadequate Anti-Money Laundering screening increases the risk of financial crime.\\\"\\n    },\\n    {\\n      \\\"issue\\\": \\\"Regulatory Compliance\\\",\\n      \\\"status\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED\\\",\\n      \\\"concern\\\": \\\"Non-compliance with regulatory requirements can result in fines and legal action.\\\"\\n    }\\n  ],\\n  \\\"recommendations_for_proceeding\\\": [\\n    \\\"Immediately address the unresolved KYC compliance issues by implementing a robust verification process.\\\",\\n    \\\"Enhance AML screening procedures to ensure all transactions are monitored and flagged appropriately.\\\",\\n    \\\"Conduct a thorough review of regulatory compliance requirements and rectify any outstanding issues.\\\",\\n    \\\"Continue to maintain and monitor internal policy compliance, as it currently meets the necessary criteria.\\\"\\n  ],\\n  \\\"compliance_confidence_score\\\": 30\\n}\\n```\", \"model_client_id\": \"compliance_reviewer\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
      "provider": "openai",
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "compliance_consolidation"
    },
    "consolidate_document_verification": {
      "agent_type": "assistant",
      "ai_response": "```json\n{\n  \"overall_verification_success_rate\": 100,\n  \"consistency_across_documents\": {\n    \"name_match\": true,\n    \"address_match\": true\n  },\n  \"risk_factors_identified\": [],\n  \"recommendation_for_proceeding\": \"All documents have been successfully verified with high scores and consistent information. Proceed with confidence.\"\n}\n```",
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "agent_type": "assistant",
          "execution_details": {
            "agent_type": "assistant",
            "input_length": 822,
            "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
            "output_length": 336,
            "provider": "openai",
            "system_message": "You are a document verification specialist. Analyze all document verification results and provide a comprehensive assessment.\n\nConsider:\n1. Overall verification success rate\n2. Consistency across documents\n3. Risk factors identified\n4. Recommendation for proceeding\n\nReturn a JSON response with your analysis.\n"
          },
          "input_format": "json",
          "model_client_id": "underwriting_analyst",
          "output": "```json\n{\n  \"overall_verification_success_rate\": 100,\n  \"consistency_across_documents\": {\n    \"name_match\": true,\n    \"address_match\": true\n  },\n  \"risk_factors_identified\": [],\n  \"recommendation_for_proceeding\": \"All documents have been successfully verified with high scores and consistent information. Proceed with confidence.\"\n}\n```\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"```json\\n{\\n  \\\"overall_verification_success_rate\\\": 100,\\n  \\\"consistency_across_documents\\\": {\\n    \\\"name_match\\\": true,\\n    \\\"address_match\\\": true\\n  },\\n  \\\"risk_factors_identified\\\": [],\\n  \\\"recommendation_for_proceeding\\\": \\\"All documents have been successfully verified with high scores and consistent information. Proceed with confidence.\\\"\\n}\\n```\", \"model_client_id\": \"underwriting_analyst\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
          "output_format": "json",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 2.742992,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.917495",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:15.174503",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.917495",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
      "model_client_id": "underwriting_analyst",
      "output": "```json\n{\n  \"overall_verification_success_rate\": 100,\n  \"consistency_across_documents\": {\n    \"name_match\": true,\n    \"address_match\": true\n  },\n  \"risk_factors_identified\": [],\n  \"recommendation_for_proceeding\": \"All documents have been successfully verified with high scores and consistent information. Proceed with confidence.\"\n}\n```\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"```json\\n{\\n  \\\"overall_verification_success_rate\\\": 100,\\n  \\\"consistency_across_documents\\\": {\\n    \\\"name_match\\\": true,\\n    \\\"address_match\\\": true\\n  },\\n  \\\"risk_factors_identified\\\": [],\\n  \\\"recommendation_for_proceeding\\\": \\\"All documents have been successfully verified with high scores and consistent information. Proceed with confidence.\\\"\\n}\\n```\", \"model_client_id\": \"underwriting_analyst\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
      "provider": "openai",
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "consolidate_document_verification"
    },
    "evaluate_default_risk": {
      "agent_type": "assistant",
      "ai_response": "To analyze the provided credit data and calculate the default risk, we will evaluate the various factors mentioned and assign a risk score based on the information available.\n\n### 1. Credit Score and History\n- **CIBIL Score**: The score is unresolved, which means we cannot assess the creditworthiness based on this metric. A low score typically indicates higher risk, while a high score indicates lower risk.\n- **Credit History**: The credit history is also unresolved. A good credit history would typically lower risk, while a poor history would increase it. \n\n### 2. Repayment Patterns\n- **Repayment Track Record**: The repayment track record is described as \"excellent.\" This indicates that the individual has consistently made payments on time, which is a positive factor in assessing default risk.\n\n### 3. Credit Utilization\n- **Loan Burden Ratio**: The loan burden ratio is 0.28 (28%), which is within a reasonable range. A lower ratio indicates that the individual is not over-leveraged and can manage their debts effectively. Generally, a ratio below 30% is considered good.\n\n### 4. Existing Loan Burden\n- **Total Monthly EMI**: The total monthly EMI is 7700.\n- **Outstanding Loans**: The total outstanding amount is 125,000, which includes:\n  - Personal Loan: 45,000 (EMI: 3500, Remaining Tenure: 18 months)\n  - Auto Loan: 80,000 (EMI: 4200, Remaining Tenure: 24 months)\n  \n  The existing loans are manageable given the excellent repayment track record.\n\n### 5. Overall Risk Profile\n- The individual has two loans with a total outstanding amount of 125,000 and a total monthly EMI of 7700. Given the loan burden ratio of 28% and an excellent repayment track record, the overall risk profile appears to be moderate to low. However, the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history create uncertainty.\n\n### Risk Score Calculation\nBased on the analysis:\n- **CIBIL Score**: Unknown (assumed average risk = 50)\n- **Credit History**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\n- **Repayment Patterns**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\n- **Credit Utilization**: 28% (low risk = 20)\n- **Existing Loan Burden**: Manageable (low risk = 20)\n\n### Risk Score Calculation\n- Average risk from CIBIL Score: 50\n- Excellent credit history: 20\n- Excellent repayment patterns: 20\n- Low credit utilization: 20\n- Manageable existing loan burden: 20\n\n**Total Risk Score = (50 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20) / 5 = 26**\n\n### Final Risk Score\n- **Risk Score**: 26 (on a scale of 1-100, where 100 is the highest risk)\n\n### Recommendations\n1. **Resolve CIBIL Score**: Obtain and resolve the CIBIL score to get a clearer picture of creditworthiness.\n2. **Maintain Excellent Repayment Patterns**: Continue the excellent repayment behavior to keep the risk low.\n3. **Monitor Credit Utilization**: Keep the loan burden ratio below 30% to maintain a healthy credit profile.\n4. **Consider Future Borrowing**: If additional loans are needed, ensure that the total EMI does not exceed 40% of monthly income to avoid over-leverage.\n5. **Regular Credit Report Checks**: Regularly check credit reports for errors or discrepancies that could affect the credit score.\n\nOverall, the individual appears to be at a low risk of default based on the available data, but the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history should be addressed for a more accurate assessment.",
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "agent_type": "assistant",
          "execution_details": {
            "agent_type": "assistant",
            "input_length": 561,
            "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
            "output_length": 3295,
            "provider": "openai",
            "system_message": "You are a credit risk assessment specialist. Analyze the provided credit data and calculate default risk.\n\nConsider:\n1. Credit score and history\n2. Repayment patterns\n3. Credit utilization\n4. Existing loan burden\n5. Overall risk profile\n\nProvide a risk score (1-100, where 100 is highest risk) and detailed risk analysis.\n"
          },
          "input_format": "json",
          "model_client_id": "risk_assessor",
          "output": "To analyze the provided credit data and calculate the default risk, we will evaluate the various factors mentioned and assign a risk score based on the information available.\n\n### 1. Credit Score and History\n- **CIBIL Score**: The score is unresolved, which means we cannot assess the creditworthiness based on this metric. A low score typically indicates higher risk, while a high score indicates lower risk.\n- **Credit History**: The credit history is also unresolved. A good credit history would typically lower risk, while a poor history would increase it. \n\n### 2. Repayment Patterns\n- **Repayment Track Record**: The repayment track record is described as \"excellent.\" This indicates that the individual has consistently made payments on time, which is a positive factor in assessing default risk.\n\n### 3. Credit Utilization\n- **Loan Burden Ratio**: The loan burden ratio is 0.28 (28%), which is within a reasonable range. A lower ratio indicates that the individual is not over-leveraged and can manage their debts effectively. Generally, a ratio below 30% is considered good.\n\n### 4. Existing Loan Burden\n- **Total Monthly EMI**: The total monthly EMI is 7700.\n- **Outstanding Loans**: The total outstanding amount is 125,000, which includes:\n  - Personal Loan: 45,000 (EMI: 3500, Remaining Tenure: 18 months)\n  - Auto Loan: 80,000 (EMI: 4200, Remaining Tenure: 24 months)\n  \n  The existing loans are manageable given the excellent repayment track record.\n\n### 5. Overall Risk Profile\n- The individual has two loans with a total outstanding amount of 125,000 and a total monthly EMI of 7700. Given the loan burden ratio of 28% and an excellent repayment track record, the overall risk profile appears to be moderate to low. However, the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history create uncertainty.\n\n### Risk Score Calculation\nBased on the analysis:\n- **CIBIL Score**: Unknown (assumed average risk = 50)\n- **Credit History**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\n- **Repayment Patterns**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\n- **Credit Utilization**: 28% (low risk = 20)\n- **Existing Loan Burden**: Manageable (low risk = 20)\n\n### Risk Score Calculation\n- Average risk from CIBIL Score: 50\n- Excellent credit history: 20\n- Excellent repayment patterns: 20\n- Low credit utilization: 20\n- Manageable existing loan burden: 20\n\n**Total Risk Score = (50 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20) / 5 = 26**\n\n### Final Risk Score\n- **Risk Score**: 26 (on a scale of 1-100, where 100 is the highest risk)\n\n### Recommendations\n1. **Resolve CIBIL Score**: Obtain and resolve the CIBIL score to get a clearer picture of creditworthiness.\n2. **Maintain Excellent Repayment Patterns**: Continue the excellent repayment behavior to keep the risk low.\n3. **Monitor Credit Utilization**: Keep the loan burden ratio below 30% to maintain a healthy credit profile.\n4. **Consider Future Borrowing**: If additional loans are needed, ensure that the total EMI does not exceed 40% of monthly income to avoid over-leverage.\n5. **Regular Credit Report Checks**: Regularly check credit reports for errors or discrepancies that could affect the credit score.\n\nOverall, the individual appears to be at a low risk of default based on the available data, but the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history should be addressed for a more accurate assessment.\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"To analyze the provided credit data and calculate the default risk, we will evaluate the various factors mentioned and assign a risk score based on the information available.\\n\\n### 1. Credit Score and History\\n- **CIBIL Score**: The score is unresolved, which means we cannot assess the creditworthiness based on this metric. A low score typically indicates higher risk, while a high score indicates lower risk.\\n- **Credit History**: The credit history is also unresolved. A good credit history would typically lower risk, while a poor history would increase it. \\n\\n### 2. Repayment Patterns\\n- **Repayment Track Record**: The repayment track record is described as \\\"excellent.\\\" This indicates that the individual has consistently made payments on time, which is a positive factor in assessing default risk.\\n\\n### 3. Credit Utilization\\n- **Loan Burden Ratio**: The loan burden ratio is 0.28 (28%), which is within a reasonable range. A lower ratio indicates that the individual is not over-leveraged and can manage their debts effectively. Generally, a ratio below 30% is considered good.\\n\\n### 4. Existing Loan Burden\\n- **Total Monthly EMI**: The total monthly EMI is 7700.\\n- **Outstanding Loans**: The total outstanding amount is 125,000, which includes:\\n  - Personal Loan: 45,000 (EMI: 3500, Remaining Tenure: 18 months)\\n  - Auto Loan: 80,000 (EMI: 4200, Remaining Tenure: 24 months)\\n  \\n  The existing loans are manageable given the excellent repayment track record.\\n\\n### 5. Overall Risk Profile\\n- The individual has two loans with a total outstanding amount of 125,000 and a total monthly EMI of 7700. Given the loan burden ratio of 28% and an excellent repayment track record, the overall risk profile appears to be moderate to low. However, the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history create uncertainty.\\n\\n### Risk Score Calculation\\nBased on the analysis:\\n- **CIBIL Score**: Unknown (assumed average risk = 50)\\n- **Credit History**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\\n- **Repayment Patterns**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\\n- **Credit Utilization**: 28% (low risk = 20)\\n- **Existing Loan Burden**: Manageable (low risk = 20)\\n\\n### Risk Score Calculation\\n- Average risk from CIBIL Score: 50\\n- Excellent credit history: 20\\n- Excellent repayment patterns: 20\\n- Low credit utilization: 20\\n- Manageable existing loan burden: 20\\n\\n**Total Risk Score = (50 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20) / 5 = 26**\\n\\n### Final Risk Score\\n- **Risk Score**: 26 (on a scale of 1-100, where 100 is the highest risk)\\n\\n### Recommendations\\n1. **Resolve CIBIL Score**: Obtain and resolve the CIBIL score to get a clearer picture of creditworthiness.\\n2. **Maintain Excellent Repayment Patterns**: Continue the excellent repayment behavior to keep the risk low.\\n3. **Monitor Credit Utilization**: Keep the loan burden ratio below 30% to maintain a healthy credit profile.\\n4. **Consider Future Borrowing**: If additional loans are needed, ensure that the total EMI does not exceed 40% of monthly income to avoid over-leverage.\\n5. **Regular Credit Report Checks**: Regularly check credit reports for errors or discrepancies that could affect the credit score.\\n\\nOverall, the individual appears to be at a low risk of default based on the available data, but the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history should be addressed for a more accurate assessment.\", \"model_client_id\": \"risk_assessor\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
          "output_format": "json",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 26.570807,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:57.170761",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.599954",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:36:57.170761",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
      "model_client_id": "risk_assessor",
      "output": "To analyze the provided credit data and calculate the default risk, we will evaluate the various factors mentioned and assign a risk score based on the information available.\n\n### 1. Credit Score and History\n- **CIBIL Score**: The score is unresolved, which means we cannot assess the creditworthiness based on this metric. A low score typically indicates higher risk, while a high score indicates lower risk.\n- **Credit History**: The credit history is also unresolved. A good credit history would typically lower risk, while a poor history would increase it. \n\n### 2. Repayment Patterns\n- **Repayment Track Record**: The repayment track record is described as \"excellent.\" This indicates that the individual has consistently made payments on time, which is a positive factor in assessing default risk.\n\n### 3. Credit Utilization\n- **Loan Burden Ratio**: The loan burden ratio is 0.28 (28%), which is within a reasonable range. A lower ratio indicates that the individual is not over-leveraged and can manage their debts effectively. Generally, a ratio below 30% is considered good.\n\n### 4. Existing Loan Burden\n- **Total Monthly EMI**: The total monthly EMI is 7700.\n- **Outstanding Loans**: The total outstanding amount is 125,000, which includes:\n  - Personal Loan: 45,000 (EMI: 3500, Remaining Tenure: 18 months)\n  - Auto Loan: 80,000 (EMI: 4200, Remaining Tenure: 24 months)\n  \n  The existing loans are manageable given the excellent repayment track record.\n\n### 5. Overall Risk Profile\n- The individual has two loans with a total outstanding amount of 125,000 and a total monthly EMI of 7700. Given the loan burden ratio of 28% and an excellent repayment track record, the overall risk profile appears to be moderate to low. However, the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history create uncertainty.\n\n### Risk Score Calculation\nBased on the analysis:\n- **CIBIL Score**: Unknown (assumed average risk = 50)\n- **Credit History**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\n- **Repayment Patterns**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\n- **Credit Utilization**: 28% (low risk = 20)\n- **Existing Loan Burden**: Manageable (low risk = 20)\n\n### Risk Score Calculation\n- Average risk from CIBIL Score: 50\n- Excellent credit history: 20\n- Excellent repayment patterns: 20\n- Low credit utilization: 20\n- Manageable existing loan burden: 20\n\n**Total Risk Score = (50 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20) / 5 = 26**\n\n### Final Risk Score\n- **Risk Score**: 26 (on a scale of 1-100, where 100 is the highest risk)\n\n### Recommendations\n1. **Resolve CIBIL Score**: Obtain and resolve the CIBIL score to get a clearer picture of creditworthiness.\n2. **Maintain Excellent Repayment Patterns**: Continue the excellent repayment behavior to keep the risk low.\n3. **Monitor Credit Utilization**: Keep the loan burden ratio below 30% to maintain a healthy credit profile.\n4. **Consider Future Borrowing**: If additional loans are needed, ensure that the total EMI does not exceed 40% of monthly income to avoid over-leverage.\n5. **Regular Credit Report Checks**: Regularly check credit reports for errors or discrepancies that could affect the credit score.\n\nOverall, the individual appears to be at a low risk of default based on the available data, but the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history should be addressed for a more accurate assessment.\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"To analyze the provided credit data and calculate the default risk, we will evaluate the various factors mentioned and assign a risk score based on the information available.\\n\\n### 1. Credit Score and History\\n- **CIBIL Score**: The score is unresolved, which means we cannot assess the creditworthiness based on this metric. A low score typically indicates higher risk, while a high score indicates lower risk.\\n- **Credit History**: The credit history is also unresolved. A good credit history would typically lower risk, while a poor history would increase it. \\n\\n### 2. Repayment Patterns\\n- **Repayment Track Record**: The repayment track record is described as \\\"excellent.\\\" This indicates that the individual has consistently made payments on time, which is a positive factor in assessing default risk.\\n\\n### 3. Credit Utilization\\n- **Loan Burden Ratio**: The loan burden ratio is 0.28 (28%), which is within a reasonable range. A lower ratio indicates that the individual is not over-leveraged and can manage their debts effectively. Generally, a ratio below 30% is considered good.\\n\\n### 4. Existing Loan Burden\\n- **Total Monthly EMI**: The total monthly EMI is 7700.\\n- **Outstanding Loans**: The total outstanding amount is 125,000, which includes:\\n  - Personal Loan: 45,000 (EMI: 3500, Remaining Tenure: 18 months)\\n  - Auto Loan: 80,000 (EMI: 4200, Remaining Tenure: 24 months)\\n  \\n  The existing loans are manageable given the excellent repayment track record.\\n\\n### 5. Overall Risk Profile\\n- The individual has two loans with a total outstanding amount of 125,000 and a total monthly EMI of 7700. Given the loan burden ratio of 28% and an excellent repayment track record, the overall risk profile appears to be moderate to low. However, the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history create uncertainty.\\n\\n### Risk Score Calculation\\nBased on the analysis:\\n- **CIBIL Score**: Unknown (assumed average risk = 50)\\n- **Credit History**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\\n- **Repayment Patterns**: Excellent (low risk = 20)\\n- **Credit Utilization**: 28% (low risk = 20)\\n- **Existing Loan Burden**: Manageable (low risk = 20)\\n\\n### Risk Score Calculation\\n- Average risk from CIBIL Score: 50\\n- Excellent credit history: 20\\n- Excellent repayment patterns: 20\\n- Low credit utilization: 20\\n- Manageable existing loan burden: 20\\n\\n**Total Risk Score = (50 + 20 + 20 + 20 + 20) / 5 = 26**\\n\\n### Final Risk Score\\n- **Risk Score**: 26 (on a scale of 1-100, where 100 is the highest risk)\\n\\n### Recommendations\\n1. **Resolve CIBIL Score**: Obtain and resolve the CIBIL score to get a clearer picture of creditworthiness.\\n2. **Maintain Excellent Repayment Patterns**: Continue the excellent repayment behavior to keep the risk low.\\n3. **Monitor Credit Utilization**: Keep the loan burden ratio below 30% to maintain a healthy credit profile.\\n4. **Consider Future Borrowing**: If additional loans are needed, ensure that the total EMI does not exceed 40% of monthly income to avoid over-leverage.\\n5. **Regular Credit Report Checks**: Regularly check credit reports for errors or discrepancies that could affect the credit score.\\n\\nOverall, the individual appears to be at a low risk of default based on the available data, but the unresolved CIBIL score and credit history should be addressed for a more accurate assessment.\", \"model_client_id\": \"risk_assessor\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
      "provider": "openai",
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "evaluate_default_risk"
    },
    "extract_application_info": {
      "customer_info": {
        "address": "123 Main St, City, State 12345",
        "annual_income": 75000,
        "customer_id": "CUST_12345",
        "email": "john.doe@email.com",
        "employment_status": "employed",
        "full_name": "John Doe",
        "loan_purpose": "home_purchase",
        "phone": "+1-555-0123",
        "requested_amount": 1000
      },
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"extraction_success\": true, \"customer_info\": {\"customer_id\": \"CUST_12345\", \"full_name\": \"John Doe\", \"email\": \"john.doe@email.com\", \"phone\": \"+1-555-0123\", \"address\": \"123 Main St, City, State 12345\", \"employment_status\": \"employed\", \"annual_income\": 75000, \"loan_purpose\": \"home_purchase\", \"requested_amount\": 1000}, \"missing_fields\": []}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.276795,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:09.566068",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:09.289273",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:09.566068",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "extraction_success": true,
      "missing_fields": [],
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"extraction_success\": true, \"customer_info\": {\"customer_id\": \"CUST_12345\", \"full_name\": \"John Doe\", \"email\": \"john.doe@email.com\", \"phone\": \"+1-555-0123\", \"address\": \"123 Main St, City, State 12345\", \"employment_status\": \"employed\", \"annual_income\": 75000, \"loan_purpose\": \"home_purchase\", \"requested_amount\": 1000}, \"missing_fields\": []}\n",
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "extract_application_info"
    },
    "final_underwriting_analysis": {
      "agent_type": "assistant",
      "ai_response": "1. **Final Recommendation**: DECLINE\n\n2. **Loan Terms and Conditions**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\n\n3. **Risk Mitigation Measures**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\n\n4. **Reasoning for Decision**: The decision to decline the loan application is based on multiple unresolved assessments that are critical to determining the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile. Specifically, the following factors were noted:\n\n   - **Application Quality**: The unresolved application quality check raises concerns about the completeness and accuracy of the information provided by the applicant. Without a thorough review of the application quality, it is difficult to ascertain the reliability of the applicant\u0027s information.\n   \n   - **Document Verification**: The unresolved document verification indicates that necessary documentation has not been adequately verified. This is a significant red flag, as it prevents us from confirming the applicant\u0027s identity, income, and other critical factors.\n   \n   - **Income Assessment**: An unresolved income assessment means we cannot accurately evaluate the applicant\u0027s ability to repay the loan. This is a fundamental aspect of underwriting, and without this information, we cannot proceed.\n   \n   - **Credit Score**: The unresolved credit score calculation means we lack insight into the applicant\u0027s creditworthiness. A credit score is a key indicator of the likelihood of default, and without it, we cannot assess the risk appropriately.\n   \n   - **Default Risk**: The unresolved evaluation of default risk further complicates the decision-making process. Without understanding the potential for default, we cannot make an informed decision regarding the loan.\n   \n   - **Compliance**: The unresolved compliance consolidation indicates that there may be regulatory or legal issues that have not been addressed. Compliance is critical in underwriting, and any unresolved issues could expose the lender to legal risks.\n   \n   - **Debt-to-Income Ratio**: The unresolved calculation of the debt-to-income ratio means we cannot assess the applicant\u0027s financial health and ability to manage additional debt. This is essential for understanding the applicant\u0027s overall financial situation.\n\nGiven these unresolved issues, the risk associated with this loan application is too high, and we cannot proceed with approval. \n\n5. **Confidence Level**: 95\n\nThe confidence level is high due to the clear and significant unresolved issues that prevent a thorough assessment of the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile.",
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "agent_type": "assistant",
          "execution_details": {
            "agent_type": "assistant",
            "input_length": 484,
            "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
            "output_length": 2554,
            "provider": "openai",
            "system_message": "You are a senior underwriting manager making final loan decisions.\n\nAnalyze all assessment results and provide:\n1. Final recommendation (APPROVE/CONDITIONAL/DECLINE)\n2. Loan terms and conditions\n3. Risk mitigation measures\n4. Reasoning for decision\n5. Confidence level (1-100)\n\nConsider all factors: income, credit, compliance, and overall risk profile.\n"
          },
          "input_format": "json",
          "model_client_id": "underwriting_analyst",
          "output": "1. **Final Recommendation**: DECLINE\n\n2. **Loan Terms and Conditions**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\n\n3. **Risk Mitigation Measures**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\n\n4. **Reasoning for Decision**: The decision to decline the loan application is based on multiple unresolved assessments that are critical to determining the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile. Specifically, the following factors were noted:\n\n   - **Application Quality**: The unresolved application quality check raises concerns about the completeness and accuracy of the information provided by the applicant. Without a thorough review of the application quality, it is difficult to ascertain the reliability of the applicant\u0027s information.\n   \n   - **Document Verification**: The unresolved document verification indicates that necessary documentation has not been adequately verified. This is a significant red flag, as it prevents us from confirming the applicant\u0027s identity, income, and other critical factors.\n   \n   - **Income Assessment**: An unresolved income assessment means we cannot accurately evaluate the applicant\u0027s ability to repay the loan. This is a fundamental aspect of underwriting, and without this information, we cannot proceed.\n   \n   - **Credit Score**: The unresolved credit score calculation means we lack insight into the applicant\u0027s creditworthiness. A credit score is a key indicator of the likelihood of default, and without it, we cannot assess the risk appropriately.\n   \n   - **Default Risk**: The unresolved evaluation of default risk further complicates the decision-making process. Without understanding the potential for default, we cannot make an informed decision regarding the loan.\n   \n   - **Compliance**: The unresolved compliance consolidation indicates that there may be regulatory or legal issues that have not been addressed. Compliance is critical in underwriting, and any unresolved issues could expose the lender to legal risks.\n   \n   - **Debt-to-Income Ratio**: The unresolved calculation of the debt-to-income ratio means we cannot assess the applicant\u0027s financial health and ability to manage additional debt. This is essential for understanding the applicant\u0027s overall financial situation.\n\nGiven these unresolved issues, the risk associated with this loan application is too high, and we cannot proceed with approval. \n\n5. **Confidence Level**: 95\n\nThe confidence level is high due to the clear and significant unresolved issues that prevent a thorough assessment of the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile.\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"1. **Final Recommendation**: DECLINE\\n\\n2. **Loan Terms and Conditions**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\\n\\n3. **Risk Mitigation Measures**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\\n\\n4. **Reasoning for Decision**: The decision to decline the loan application is based on multiple unresolved assessments that are critical to determining the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile. Specifically, the following factors were noted:\\n\\n   - **Application Quality**: The unresolved application quality check raises concerns about the completeness and accuracy of the information provided by the applicant. Without a thorough review of the application quality, it is difficult to ascertain the reliability of the applicant\u0027s information.\\n   \\n   - **Document Verification**: The unresolved document verification indicates that necessary documentation has not been adequately verified. This is a significant red flag, as it prevents us from confirming the applicant\u0027s identity, income, and other critical factors.\\n   \\n   - **Income Assessment**: An unresolved income assessment means we cannot accurately evaluate the applicant\u0027s ability to repay the loan. This is a fundamental aspect of underwriting, and without this information, we cannot proceed.\\n   \\n   - **Credit Score**: The unresolved credit score calculation means we lack insight into the applicant\u0027s creditworthiness. A credit score is a key indicator of the likelihood of default, and without it, we cannot assess the risk appropriately.\\n   \\n   - **Default Risk**: The unresolved evaluation of default risk further complicates the decision-making process. Without understanding the potential for default, we cannot make an informed decision regarding the loan.\\n   \\n   - **Compliance**: The unresolved compliance consolidation indicates that there may be regulatory or legal issues that have not been addressed. Compliance is critical in underwriting, and any unresolved issues could expose the lender to legal risks.\\n   \\n   - **Debt-to-Income Ratio**: The unresolved calculation of the debt-to-income ratio means we cannot assess the applicant\u0027s financial health and ability to manage additional debt. This is essential for understanding the applicant\u0027s overall financial situation.\\n\\nGiven these unresolved issues, the risk associated with this loan application is too high, and we cannot proceed with approval. \\n\\n5. **Confidence Level**: 95\\n\\nThe confidence level is high due to the clear and significant unresolved issues that prevent a thorough assessment of the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile.\", \"model_client_id\": \"underwriting_analyst\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
          "output_format": "json",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 9.077867,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:40:09.608167",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:40:00.530300",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:40:09.608167",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
      "model_client_id": "underwriting_analyst",
      "output": "1. **Final Recommendation**: DECLINE\n\n2. **Loan Terms and Conditions**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\n\n3. **Risk Mitigation Measures**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\n\n4. **Reasoning for Decision**: The decision to decline the loan application is based on multiple unresolved assessments that are critical to determining the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile. Specifically, the following factors were noted:\n\n   - **Application Quality**: The unresolved application quality check raises concerns about the completeness and accuracy of the information provided by the applicant. Without a thorough review of the application quality, it is difficult to ascertain the reliability of the applicant\u0027s information.\n   \n   - **Document Verification**: The unresolved document verification indicates that necessary documentation has not been adequately verified. This is a significant red flag, as it prevents us from confirming the applicant\u0027s identity, income, and other critical factors.\n   \n   - **Income Assessment**: An unresolved income assessment means we cannot accurately evaluate the applicant\u0027s ability to repay the loan. This is a fundamental aspect of underwriting, and without this information, we cannot proceed.\n   \n   - **Credit Score**: The unresolved credit score calculation means we lack insight into the applicant\u0027s creditworthiness. A credit score is a key indicator of the likelihood of default, and without it, we cannot assess the risk appropriately.\n   \n   - **Default Risk**: The unresolved evaluation of default risk further complicates the decision-making process. Without understanding the potential for default, we cannot make an informed decision regarding the loan.\n   \n   - **Compliance**: The unresolved compliance consolidation indicates that there may be regulatory or legal issues that have not been addressed. Compliance is critical in underwriting, and any unresolved issues could expose the lender to legal risks.\n   \n   - **Debt-to-Income Ratio**: The unresolved calculation of the debt-to-income ratio means we cannot assess the applicant\u0027s financial health and ability to manage additional debt. This is essential for understanding the applicant\u0027s overall financial situation.\n\nGiven these unresolved issues, the risk associated with this loan application is too high, and we cannot proceed with approval. \n\n5. **Confidence Level**: 95\n\nThe confidence level is high due to the clear and significant unresolved issues that prevent a thorough assessment of the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile.\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"1. **Final Recommendation**: DECLINE\\n\\n2. **Loan Terms and Conditions**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\\n\\n3. **Risk Mitigation Measures**: N/A (Loan application is declined)\\n\\n4. **Reasoning for Decision**: The decision to decline the loan application is based on multiple unresolved assessments that are critical to determining the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile. Specifically, the following factors were noted:\\n\\n   - **Application Quality**: The unresolved application quality check raises concerns about the completeness and accuracy of the information provided by the applicant. Without a thorough review of the application quality, it is difficult to ascertain the reliability of the applicant\u0027s information.\\n   \\n   - **Document Verification**: The unresolved document verification indicates that necessary documentation has not been adequately verified. This is a significant red flag, as it prevents us from confirming the applicant\u0027s identity, income, and other critical factors.\\n   \\n   - **Income Assessment**: An unresolved income assessment means we cannot accurately evaluate the applicant\u0027s ability to repay the loan. This is a fundamental aspect of underwriting, and without this information, we cannot proceed.\\n   \\n   - **Credit Score**: The unresolved credit score calculation means we lack insight into the applicant\u0027s creditworthiness. A credit score is a key indicator of the likelihood of default, and without it, we cannot assess the risk appropriately.\\n   \\n   - **Default Risk**: The unresolved evaluation of default risk further complicates the decision-making process. Without understanding the potential for default, we cannot make an informed decision regarding the loan.\\n   \\n   - **Compliance**: The unresolved compliance consolidation indicates that there may be regulatory or legal issues that have not been addressed. Compliance is critical in underwriting, and any unresolved issues could expose the lender to legal risks.\\n   \\n   - **Debt-to-Income Ratio**: The unresolved calculation of the debt-to-income ratio means we cannot assess the applicant\u0027s financial health and ability to manage additional debt. This is essential for understanding the applicant\u0027s overall financial situation.\\n\\nGiven these unresolved issues, the risk associated with this loan application is too high, and we cannot proceed with approval. \\n\\n5. **Confidence Level**: 95\\n\\nThe confidence level is high due to the clear and significant unresolved issues that prevent a thorough assessment of the applicant\u0027s eligibility and risk profile.\", \"model_client_id\": \"underwriting_analyst\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
      "provider": "openai",
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "final_underwriting_analysis"
    },
    "flag_for_manual_review": {
      "error": "Unsupported task type: human",
      "execution_details": {
        "failed": true,
        "message_sent": true,
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "output": "Task failed: Unsupported task type: human",
      "status": "FAILED",
      "task_id": "flag_for_manual_review"
    },
    "generate_final_output": {
      "error": "Python script failed with return code 1: Traceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"/tmp/tmp3k60_q0s.py\", line 15, in \u003cmodule\u003e\n    \"credit_score\": UNRESOLVED_calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score,\n                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nNameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_calculate_credit_score\u0027 is not defined\n",
      "execution_details": {
        "failed": true,
        "message_sent": true,
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "output": "Task failed: Python script failed with return code 1: Traceback (most recent call last):\n  File \"/tmp/tmp3k60_q0s.py\", line 15, in \u003cmodule\u003e\n    \"credit_score\": UNRESOLVED_calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score,\n                    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^\nNameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_calculate_credit_score\u0027 is not defined\n",
      "status": "FAILED",
      "task_id": "generate_final_output"
    },
    "income_assessment": {
      "agent_type": "assistant",
      "ai_response": "Based on the provided income data and the context of the analysis, here is a detailed JSON assessment:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"income_assessment\": {\n    \"income_stability\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"High\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"employment_type\": \"Permanent\",\n        \"job_stability_score\": 88.5,\n        \"employer_rating\": \"A+\",\n        \"probation_status\": \"Confirmed\",\n        \"employment_verified\": true\n      }\n    },\n    \"debt_servicing_capability\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Unable to assess due to calculation error\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"debt_to_income_calculation\": {\n          \"error\": \"Python script failed with return code 1\",\n          \"error_message\": \"NameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_variables\u0027 is not defined\"\n        }\n      }\n    },\n    \"financial_discipline\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Pending further analysis\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"bank_statement_analysis\": \"UNRESOLVED_analyze_bank_statements\",\n        \"salary_analysis\": \"UNRESOLVED_analyze_salary_slips\",\n        \"tax_returns\": \"UNRESOLVED_verify_tax_returns\"\n      }\n    },\n    \"risk_factors\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Moderate\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"employment_stability\": \"High, but dependent on further financial data\",\n        \"debt_servicing\": \"Unknown due to unresolved calculations\",\n        \"financial_discipline\": \"Pending further verification\"\n      }\n    },\n    \"recommendations\": {\n      \"1\": \"Resolve the issues with the debt-to-income calculation to assess debt servicing capability.\",\n      \"2\": \"Conduct a thorough review of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns for a complete financial picture.\",\n      \"3\": \"Consider additional verification of income sources if available.\"\n    },\n    \"overall_income_adequacy_score\": 75\n  }\n}\n```\n\n### Explanation of the Assessment:\n\n1. **Income Stability Assessment**: The employment details indicate a high level of job stability with a permanent position and a strong employer rating. The job stability score of 88.5 further supports this assessment.\n\n2. **Debt Servicing Capability**: Unfortunately, the debt-to-income calculation could not be completed due to a script error. This prevents a full assessment of the individual\u0027s ability to service debt.\n\n3. **Financial Discipline Evaluation**: The financial discipline evaluation is pending as the necessary analyses of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns have not been resolved.\n\n4. **Risk Factors and Recommendations**: The risk factors are assessed as moderate due to the unknowns in debt servicing and financial discipline. Recommendations include resolving the calculation issues and conducting further financial reviews.\n\n5. **Overall Income Adequacy Score**: Given the high employment stability but unresolved financial data, an overall score of 75 is assigned, indicating a generally adequate income situation but with significant areas needing clarification.",
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "agent_type": "assistant",
          "execution_details": {
            "agent_type": "assistant",
            "input_length": 863,
            "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
            "output_length": 2871,
            "provider": "openai",
            "system_message": "You are a senior financial analyst specializing in income assessment for loan underwriting.\n\nAnalyze the provided income data and provide:\n1. Income stability assessment\n2. Debt servicing capability\n3. Financial discipline evaluation\n4. Risk factors and recommendations\n5. Overall income adequacy score (1-100)\n\nReturn a detailed JSON assessment.\n"
          },
          "input_format": "json",
          "model_client_id": "underwriting_analyst",
          "output": "Based on the provided income data and the context of the analysis, here is a detailed JSON assessment:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"income_assessment\": {\n    \"income_stability\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"High\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"employment_type\": \"Permanent\",\n        \"job_stability_score\": 88.5,\n        \"employer_rating\": \"A+\",\n        \"probation_status\": \"Confirmed\",\n        \"employment_verified\": true\n      }\n    },\n    \"debt_servicing_capability\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Unable to assess due to calculation error\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"debt_to_income_calculation\": {\n          \"error\": \"Python script failed with return code 1\",\n          \"error_message\": \"NameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_variables\u0027 is not defined\"\n        }\n      }\n    },\n    \"financial_discipline\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Pending further analysis\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"bank_statement_analysis\": \"UNRESOLVED_analyze_bank_statements\",\n        \"salary_analysis\": \"UNRESOLVED_analyze_salary_slips\",\n        \"tax_returns\": \"UNRESOLVED_verify_tax_returns\"\n      }\n    },\n    \"risk_factors\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Moderate\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"employment_stability\": \"High, but dependent on further financial data\",\n        \"debt_servicing\": \"Unknown due to unresolved calculations\",\n        \"financial_discipline\": \"Pending further verification\"\n      }\n    },\n    \"recommendations\": {\n      \"1\": \"Resolve the issues with the debt-to-income calculation to assess debt servicing capability.\",\n      \"2\": \"Conduct a thorough review of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns for a complete financial picture.\",\n      \"3\": \"Consider additional verification of income sources if available.\"\n    },\n    \"overall_income_adequacy_score\": 75\n  }\n}\n```\n\n### Explanation of the Assessment:\n\n1. **Income Stability Assessment**: The employment details indicate a high level of job stability with a permanent position and a strong employer rating. The job stability score of 88.5 further supports this assessment.\n\n2. **Debt Servicing Capability**: Unfortunately, the debt-to-income calculation could not be completed due to a script error. This prevents a full assessment of the individual\u0027s ability to service debt.\n\n3. **Financial Discipline Evaluation**: The financial discipline evaluation is pending as the necessary analyses of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns have not been resolved.\n\n4. **Risk Factors and Recommendations**: The risk factors are assessed as moderate due to the unknowns in debt servicing and financial discipline. Recommendations include resolving the calculation issues and conducting further financial reviews.\n\n5. **Overall Income Adequacy Score**: Given the high employment stability but unresolved financial data, an overall score of 75 is assigned, indicating a generally adequate income situation but with significant areas needing clarification.\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"Based on the provided income data and the context of the analysis, here is a detailed JSON assessment:\\n\\n```json\\n{\\n  \\\"income_assessment\\\": {\\n    \\\"income_stability\\\": {\\n      \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"High\\\",\\n      \\\"details\\\": {\\n        \\\"employment_type\\\": \\\"Permanent\\\",\\n        \\\"job_stability_score\\\": 88.5,\\n        \\\"employer_rating\\\": \\\"A+\\\",\\n        \\\"probation_status\\\": \\\"Confirmed\\\",\\n        \\\"employment_verified\\\": true\\n      }\\n    },\\n    \\\"debt_servicing_capability\\\": {\\n      \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"Unable to assess due to calculation error\\\",\\n      \\\"details\\\": {\\n        \\\"debt_to_income_calculation\\\": {\\n          \\\"error\\\": \\\"Python script failed with return code 1\\\",\\n          \\\"error_message\\\": \\\"NameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_variables\u0027 is not defined\\\"\\n        }\\n      }\\n    },\\n    \\\"financial_discipline\\\": {\\n      \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"Pending further analysis\\\",\\n      \\\"details\\\": {\\n        \\\"bank_statement_analysis\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED_analyze_bank_statements\\\",\\n        \\\"salary_analysis\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED_analyze_salary_slips\\\",\\n        \\\"tax_returns\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED_verify_tax_returns\\\"\\n      }\\n    },\\n    \\\"risk_factors\\\": {\\n      \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"Moderate\\\",\\n      \\\"details\\\": {\\n        \\\"employment_stability\\\": \\\"High, but dependent on further financial data\\\",\\n        \\\"debt_servicing\\\": \\\"Unknown due to unresolved calculations\\\",\\n        \\\"financial_discipline\\\": \\\"Pending further verification\\\"\\n      }\\n    },\\n    \\\"recommendations\\\": {\\n      \\\"1\\\": \\\"Resolve the issues with the debt-to-income calculation to assess debt servicing capability.\\\",\\n      \\\"2\\\": \\\"Conduct a thorough review of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns for a complete financial picture.\\\",\\n      \\\"3\\\": \\\"Consider additional verification of income sources if available.\\\"\\n    },\\n    \\\"overall_income_adequacy_score\\\": 75\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\n### Explanation of the Assessment:\\n\\n1. **Income Stability Assessment**: The employment details indicate a high level of job stability with a permanent position and a strong employer rating. The job stability score of 88.5 further supports this assessment.\\n\\n2. **Debt Servicing Capability**: Unfortunately, the debt-to-income calculation could not be completed due to a script error. This prevents a full assessment of the individual\u0027s ability to service debt.\\n\\n3. **Financial Discipline Evaluation**: The financial discipline evaluation is pending as the necessary analyses of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns have not been resolved.\\n\\n4. **Risk Factors and Recommendations**: The risk factors are assessed as moderate due to the unknowns in debt servicing and financial discipline. Recommendations include resolving the calculation issues and conducting further financial reviews.\\n\\n5. **Overall Income Adequacy Score**: Given the high employment stability but unresolved financial data, an overall score of 75 is assigned, indicating a generally adequate income situation but with significant areas needing clarification.\", \"model_client_id\": \"underwriting_analyst\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
          "output_format": "json",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 11.932595,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.075665",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:36:18.143070",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:36:30.075665",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "model": "gpt-4o-mini",
      "model_client_id": "underwriting_analyst",
      "output": "Based on the provided income data and the context of the analysis, here is a detailed JSON assessment:\n\n```json\n{\n  \"income_assessment\": {\n    \"income_stability\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"High\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"employment_type\": \"Permanent\",\n        \"job_stability_score\": 88.5,\n        \"employer_rating\": \"A+\",\n        \"probation_status\": \"Confirmed\",\n        \"employment_verified\": true\n      }\n    },\n    \"debt_servicing_capability\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Unable to assess due to calculation error\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"debt_to_income_calculation\": {\n          \"error\": \"Python script failed with return code 1\",\n          \"error_message\": \"NameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_variables\u0027 is not defined\"\n        }\n      }\n    },\n    \"financial_discipline\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Pending further analysis\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"bank_statement_analysis\": \"UNRESOLVED_analyze_bank_statements\",\n        \"salary_analysis\": \"UNRESOLVED_analyze_salary_slips\",\n        \"tax_returns\": \"UNRESOLVED_verify_tax_returns\"\n      }\n    },\n    \"risk_factors\": {\n      \"assessment\": \"Moderate\",\n      \"details\": {\n        \"employment_stability\": \"High, but dependent on further financial data\",\n        \"debt_servicing\": \"Unknown due to unresolved calculations\",\n        \"financial_discipline\": \"Pending further verification\"\n      }\n    },\n    \"recommendations\": {\n      \"1\": \"Resolve the issues with the debt-to-income calculation to assess debt servicing capability.\",\n      \"2\": \"Conduct a thorough review of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns for a complete financial picture.\",\n      \"3\": \"Consider additional verification of income sources if available.\"\n    },\n    \"overall_income_adequacy_score\": 75\n  }\n}\n```\n\n### Explanation of the Assessment:\n\n1. **Income Stability Assessment**: The employment details indicate a high level of job stability with a permanent position and a strong employer rating. The job stability score of 88.5 further supports this assessment.\n\n2. **Debt Servicing Capability**: Unfortunately, the debt-to-income calculation could not be completed due to a script error. This prevents a full assessment of the individual\u0027s ability to service debt.\n\n3. **Financial Discipline Evaluation**: The financial discipline evaluation is pending as the necessary analyses of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns have not been resolved.\n\n4. **Risk Factors and Recommendations**: The risk factors are assessed as moderate due to the unknowns in debt servicing and financial discipline. Recommendations include resolving the calculation issues and conducting further financial reviews.\n\n5. **Overall Income Adequacy Score**: Given the high employment stability but unresolved financial data, an overall score of 75 is assigned, indicating a generally adequate income situation but with significant areas needing clarification.\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"ai_response\": \"Based on the provided income data and the context of the analysis, here is a detailed JSON assessment:\\n\\n```json\\n{\\n  \\\"income_assessment\\\": {\\n    \\\"income_stability\\\": {\\n      \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"High\\\",\\n      \\\"details\\\": {\\n        \\\"employment_type\\\": \\\"Permanent\\\",\\n        \\\"job_stability_score\\\": 88.5,\\n        \\\"employer_rating\\\": \\\"A+\\\",\\n        \\\"probation_status\\\": \\\"Confirmed\\\",\\n        \\\"employment_verified\\\": true\\n      }\\n    },\\n    \\\"debt_servicing_capability\\\": {\\n      \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"Unable to assess due to calculation error\\\",\\n      \\\"details\\\": {\\n        \\\"debt_to_income_calculation\\\": {\\n          \\\"error\\\": \\\"Python script failed with return code 1\\\",\\n          \\\"error_message\\\": \\\"NameError: name \u0027UNRESOLVED_variables\u0027 is not defined\\\"\\n        }\\n      }\\n    },\\n    \\\"financial_discipline\\\": {\\n      \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"Pending further analysis\\\",\\n      \\\"details\\\": {\\n        \\\"bank_statement_analysis\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED_analyze_bank_statements\\\",\\n        \\\"salary_analysis\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED_analyze_salary_slips\\\",\\n        \\\"tax_returns\\\": \\\"UNRESOLVED_verify_tax_returns\\\"\\n      }\\n    },\\n    \\\"risk_factors\\\": {\\n      \\\"assessment\\\": \\\"Moderate\\\",\\n      \\\"details\\\": {\\n        \\\"employment_stability\\\": \\\"High, but dependent on further financial data\\\",\\n        \\\"debt_servicing\\\": \\\"Unknown due to unresolved calculations\\\",\\n        \\\"financial_discipline\\\": \\\"Pending further verification\\\"\\n      }\\n    },\\n    \\\"recommendations\\\": {\\n      \\\"1\\\": \\\"Resolve the issues with the debt-to-income calculation to assess debt servicing capability.\\\",\\n      \\\"2\\\": \\\"Conduct a thorough review of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns for a complete financial picture.\\\",\\n      \\\"3\\\": \\\"Consider additional verification of income sources if available.\\\"\\n    },\\n    \\\"overall_income_adequacy_score\\\": 75\\n  }\\n}\\n```\\n\\n### Explanation of the Assessment:\\n\\n1. **Income Stability Assessment**: The employment details indicate a high level of job stability with a permanent position and a strong employer rating. The job stability score of 88.5 further supports this assessment.\\n\\n2. **Debt Servicing Capability**: Unfortunately, the debt-to-income calculation could not be completed due to a script error. This prevents a full assessment of the individual\u0027s ability to service debt.\\n\\n3. **Financial Discipline Evaluation**: The financial discipline evaluation is pending as the necessary analyses of bank statements, salary slips, and tax returns have not been resolved.\\n\\n4. **Risk Factors and Recommendations**: The risk factors are assessed as moderate due to the unknowns in debt servicing and financial discipline. Recommendations include resolving the calculation issues and conducting further financial reviews.\\n\\n5. **Overall Income Adequacy Score**: Given the high employment stability but unresolved financial data, an overall score of 75 is assigned, indicating a generally adequate income situation but with significant areas needing clarification.\", \"model_client_id\": \"underwriting_analyst\", \"agent_type\": \"assistant\", \"model\": \"gpt-4o-mini\", \"provider\": \"openai\", \"status\": \"completed\"}",
      "provider": "openai",
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "income_assessment"
    },
    "internal_policy_check": {
      "age_criteria_met": true,
      "credit_score_threshold_met": true,
      "employment_criteria_met": true,
      "exceptions_required": [],
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"loan_amount_within_limits\": true, \"ltv_ratio_acceptable\": true, \"income_criteria_met\": true, \"age_criteria_met\": true, \"employment_criteria_met\": true, \"credit_score_threshold_met\": true, \"geographic_restrictions_met\": true, \"policy_compliance_score\": 95.5, \"exceptions_required\": [], \"policy_version\": \"2024.1\"}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.382864,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:57.242881",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.860017",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:39:57.242881",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "geographic_restrictions_met": true,
      "income_criteria_met": true,
      "loan_amount_within_limits": true,
      "ltv_ratio_acceptable": true,
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"loan_amount_within_limits\": true, \"ltv_ratio_acceptable\": true, \"income_criteria_met\": true, \"age_criteria_met\": true, \"employment_criteria_met\": true, \"credit_score_threshold_met\": true, \"geographic_restrictions_met\": true, \"policy_compliance_score\": 95.5, \"exceptions_required\": [], \"policy_version\": \"2024.1\"}\n",
      "policy_compliance_score": 95.5,
      "policy_version": "2024.1",
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "internal_policy_check"
    },
    "kyc_compliance_check": {
      "address_verified": true,
      "compliance_score": 98.5,
      "documents_complete": true,
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"kyc_status\": \"compliant\", \"identity_verified\": true, \"address_verified\": true, \"income_verified\": true, \"documents_complete\": true, \"risk_category\": \"low\", \"compliance_score\": 98.5, \"last_updated\": \"2024-07-15\", \"regulatory_requirements_met\": true}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.321735,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.364676",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.042941",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.364676",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "identity_verified": true,
      "income_verified": true,
      "kyc_status": "compliant",
      "last_updated": "2024-07-15",
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"kyc_status\": \"compliant\", \"identity_verified\": true, \"address_verified\": true, \"income_verified\": true, \"documents_complete\": true, \"risk_category\": \"low\", \"compliance_score\": 98.5, \"last_updated\": \"2024-07-15\", \"regulatory_requirements_met\": true}\n",
      "regulatory_requirements_met": true,
      "return_code": 0,
      "risk_category": "low",
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "kyc_compliance_check"
    },
    "regulatory_compliance": {
      "audit_trail_complete": true,
      "compliance_score": 97.2,
      "consumer_protection_compliant": true,
      "data_privacy_compliant": true,
      "disclosure_requirements_met": true,
      "documentation_complete": true,
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"rbi_guidelines_met\": true, \"lending_norms_compliant\": true, \"documentation_complete\": true, \"disclosure_requirements_met\": true, \"consumer_protection_compliant\": true, \"data_privacy_compliant\": true, \"compliance_score\": 97.2, \"audit_trail_complete\": true, \"regulatory_risk\": \"minimal\"}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.319946,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.908258",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.588312",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:39:56.908258",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "lending_norms_compliant": true,
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"rbi_guidelines_met\": true, \"lending_norms_compliant\": true, \"documentation_complete\": true, \"disclosure_requirements_met\": true, \"consumer_protection_compliant\": true, \"data_privacy_compliant\": true, \"compliance_score\": 97.2, \"audit_trail_complete\": true, \"regulatory_risk\": \"minimal\"}\n",
      "rbi_guidelines_met": true,
      "regulatory_risk": "minimal",
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "regulatory_compliance"
    },
    "underwriting_decision_router": {
      "all_conditions_checked": [
        {
          "condition": "${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003c 600 || ${calculate_debt_to_income.debt_to_income_ratio} \u003e 0.50",
          "name": "high_risk_path",
          "result": false,
          "route": "decline_path"
        },
        {
          "condition": "${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003e= 600 \u0026\u0026 ${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003c 700",
          "name": "conditional_approval_path",
          "result": false,
          "route": "conditional_path"
        },
        {
          "condition": "${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003e= 700",
          "name": "standard_approval_path",
          "result": false,
          "route": "approval_path"
        }
      ],
      "duration_seconds": 0.001374,
      "ended_at": "2025-07-15T12:40:00.414604",
      "evaluation_details": {},
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "Route selected: manual_review_path\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"router_type\": \"condition\", \"selected_route\": \"manual_review_path\", \"route_reason\": \"no_conditions_matched\", \"evaluation_details\": {}, \"all_conditions_checked\": [{\"name\": \"high_risk_path\", \"condition\": \"${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003c 600 || ${calculate_debt_to_income.debt_to_income_ratio} \u003e 0.50\", \"result\": false, \"route\": \"decline_path\"}, {\"name\": \"conditional_approval_path\", \"condition\": \"${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003e= 600 \u0026\u0026 ${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003c 700\", \"result\": false, \"route\": \"conditional_path\"}, {\"name\": \"standard_approval_path\", \"condition\": \"${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003e= 700\", \"result\": false, \"route\": \"approval_path\"}], \"duration_seconds\": 0.001374, \"started_at\": \"2025-07-15T12:40:00.413230\", \"ended_at\": \"2025-07-15T12:40:00.414604\"}",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.314828,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:40:00.590452",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:40:00.275624",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:40:00.590452",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "output": "Route selected: manual_review_path\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"router_type\": \"condition\", \"selected_route\": \"manual_review_path\", \"route_reason\": \"no_conditions_matched\", \"evaluation_details\": {}, \"all_conditions_checked\": [{\"name\": \"high_risk_path\", \"condition\": \"${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003c 600 || ${calculate_debt_to_income.debt_to_income_ratio} \u003e 0.50\", \"result\": false, \"route\": \"decline_path\"}, {\"name\": \"conditional_approval_path\", \"condition\": \"${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003e= 600 \u0026\u0026 ${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003c 700\", \"result\": false, \"route\": \"conditional_path\"}, {\"name\": \"standard_approval_path\", \"condition\": \"${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003e= 700\", \"result\": false, \"route\": \"approval_path\"}], \"duration_seconds\": 0.001374, \"started_at\": \"2025-07-15T12:40:00.413230\", \"ended_at\": \"2025-07-15T12:40:00.414604\"}",
      "return_code": 0,
      "route_reason": "no_conditions_matched",
      "router_type": "condition",
      "selected_route": "manual_review_path",
      "started_at": "2025-07-15T12:40:00.413230",
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "underwriting_decision_router"
    },
    "validate_application_fields": {
      "completion_percentage": 100.0,
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"validation_passed\": true, \"missing_fields\": [], \"completion_percentage\": 100.0}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.242848,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:09.761672",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:09.518824",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:09.761672",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "missing_fields": [],
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"validation_passed\": true, \"missing_fields\": [], \"completion_percentage\": 100.0}\n",
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "validate_application_fields",
      "validation_passed": true
    },
    "verify_aadhaar": {
      "aadhaar_masked": "1234-5678-9012",
      "address_match": true,
      "biometric_verified": true,
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"aadhaar_masked\": \"1234-5678-9012\", \"is_valid\": true, \"address_match\": true, \"biometric_verified\": true, \"verification_score\": 98.2, \"last_updated\": \"2024-01-15\"}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.518329,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.826603",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.308274",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.826603",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "is_valid": true,
      "last_updated": "2024-01-15",
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"aadhaar_masked\": \"1234-5678-9012\", \"is_valid\": true, \"address_match\": true, \"biometric_verified\": true, \"verification_score\": 98.2, \"last_updated\": \"2024-01-15\"}\n",
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "verify_aadhaar",
      "verification_score": 98.2
    },
    "verify_address_proof": {
      "address_confirmed": "123 Main St, City, State 12345",
      "address_match": true,
      "document_date": "2024-06-15",
      "document_type": "utility_bill",
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"document_type\": \"utility_bill\", \"is_valid\": true, \"address_match\": true, \"document_date\": \"2024-06-15\", \"verification_score\": 92.3, \"address_confirmed\": \"123 Main St, City, State 12345\"}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.833477,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:15.219270",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.385793",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:15.219270",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "is_valid": true,
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"document_type\": \"utility_bill\", \"is_valid\": true, \"address_match\": true, \"document_date\": \"2024-06-15\", \"verification_score\": 92.3, \"address_confirmed\": \"123 Main St, City, State 12345\"}\n",
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "verify_address_proof",
      "verification_score": 92.3
    },
    "verify_employment": {
      "designation": "Senior Software Engineer",
      "employer_rating": "A+",
      "employment_confirmed": true,
      "employment_type": "permanent",
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"employment_confirmed\": true, \"designation\": \"Senior Software Engineer\", \"employment_type\": \"permanent\", \"probation_status\": \"confirmed\", \"employer_rating\": \"A+\", \"job_stability_score\": 88.5, \"reference_check_passed\": true, \"hr_contact_verified\": true}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.601832,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:18.230474",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.628642",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:18.230474",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "hr_contact_verified": true,
      "job_stability_score": 88.5,
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"employment_confirmed\": true, \"designation\": \"Senior Software Engineer\", \"employment_type\": \"permanent\", \"probation_status\": \"confirmed\", \"employer_rating\": \"A+\", \"job_stability_score\": 88.5, \"reference_check_passed\": true, \"hr_contact_verified\": true}\n",
      "probation_status": "confirmed",
      "reference_check_passed": true,
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "verify_employment"
    },
    "verify_pan_card": {
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"pan_number\": \"ABCDE1234F\", \"is_valid\": true, \"name_match\": true, \"status\": \"active\", \"verification_score\": 95.5, \"verified_name\": \"JOHN DOE\"}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.358562,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.626568",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.268006",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.626568",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "is_valid": true,
      "name_match": true,
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"pan_number\": \"ABCDE1234F\", \"is_valid\": true, \"name_match\": true, \"status\": \"active\", \"verification_score\": 95.5, \"verified_name\": \"JOHN DOE\"}\n",
      "pan_number": "ABCDE1234F",
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "verify_pan_card",
      "verification_score": 95.5,
      "verified_name": "JOHN DOE"
    },
    "verify_passport": {
      "document_provided": true,
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"passport_number\": \"A1234567\", \"is_valid\": true, \"expiry_date\": \"2030-12-31\", \"issuing_authority\": \"Government of India\", \"verification_score\": 96.8, \"document_provided\": true}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.616294,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.963870",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.347576",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.963870",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "expiry_date": "2030-12-31",
      "is_valid": true,
      "issuing_authority": "Government of India",
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"passport_number\": \"A1234567\", \"is_valid\": true, \"expiry_date\": \"2030-12-31\", \"issuing_authority\": \"Government of India\", \"verification_score\": 96.8, \"document_provided\": true}\n",
      "passport_number": "A1234567",
      "return_code": 0,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "verify_passport",
      "verification_score": 96.8
    },
    "verify_tax_returns": {
      "declared_income": 98000,
      "discrepancies_found": false,
      "execution_details": {
        "actual_result": {
          "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"declared_income\": 98000, \"tax_paid\": 12000, \"returns_filed_consistently\": true, \"income_growth_trend\": \"positive\", \"discrepancies_found\": false, \"verification_with_govt\": true, \"tax_compliance_score\": 92.0}\n",
          "return_code": 0,
          "status": "completed",
          "stderr": ""
        },
        "duration_seconds": 0.814493,
        "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:18.127688",
        "message_sent": true,
        "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.313195",
        "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:18.127688",
        "worker_executed": true,
        "workers_notified": true
      },
      "income_growth_trend": "positive",
      "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"declared_income\": 98000, \"tax_paid\": 12000, \"returns_filed_consistently\": true, \"income_growth_trend\": \"positive\", \"discrepancies_found\": false, \"verification_with_govt\": true, \"tax_compliance_score\": 92.0}\n",
      "return_code": 0,
      "returns_filed_consistently": true,
      "status": "completed",
      "stderr": "",
      "task_id": "verify_tax_returns",
      "tax_compliance_score": 92.0,
      "tax_paid": 12000,
      "verification_with_govt": true
    }
  },
  "underwriting_decision_router": {
    "all_conditions_checked": [
      {
        "condition": "${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003c 600 || ${calculate_debt_to_income.debt_to_income_ratio} \u003e 0.50",
        "name": "high_risk_path",
        "result": false,
        "route": "decline_path"
      },
      {
        "condition": "${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003e= 600 \u0026\u0026 ${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003c 700",
        "name": "conditional_approval_path",
        "result": false,
        "route": "conditional_path"
      },
      {
        "condition": "${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003e= 700",
        "name": "standard_approval_path",
        "result": false,
        "route": "approval_path"
      }
    ],
    "duration_seconds": 0.001374,
    "ended_at": "2025-07-15T12:40:00.414604",
    "evaluation_details": {},
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "Route selected: manual_review_path\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"router_type\": \"condition\", \"selected_route\": \"manual_review_path\", \"route_reason\": \"no_conditions_matched\", \"evaluation_details\": {}, \"all_conditions_checked\": [{\"name\": \"high_risk_path\", \"condition\": \"${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003c 600 || ${calculate_debt_to_income.debt_to_income_ratio} \u003e 0.50\", \"result\": false, \"route\": \"decline_path\"}, {\"name\": \"conditional_approval_path\", \"condition\": \"${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003e= 600 \u0026\u0026 ${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003c 700\", \"result\": false, \"route\": \"conditional_path\"}, {\"name\": \"standard_approval_path\", \"condition\": \"${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003e= 700\", \"result\": false, \"route\": \"approval_path\"}], \"duration_seconds\": 0.001374, \"started_at\": \"2025-07-15T12:40:00.413230\", \"ended_at\": \"2025-07-15T12:40:00.414604\"}",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.314828,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:40:00.590452",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:40:00.275624",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:40:00.590452",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "output": "Route selected: manual_review_path\n__OUTPUTS__ {\"router_type\": \"condition\", \"selected_route\": \"manual_review_path\", \"route_reason\": \"no_conditions_matched\", \"evaluation_details\": {}, \"all_conditions_checked\": [{\"name\": \"high_risk_path\", \"condition\": \"${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003c 600 || ${calculate_debt_to_income.debt_to_income_ratio} \u003e 0.50\", \"result\": false, \"route\": \"decline_path\"}, {\"name\": \"conditional_approval_path\", \"condition\": \"${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003e= 600 \u0026\u0026 ${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003c 700\", \"result\": false, \"route\": \"conditional_path\"}, {\"name\": \"standard_approval_path\", \"condition\": \"${calculate_credit_score.internal_credit_score} \u003e= 700\", \"result\": false, \"route\": \"approval_path\"}], \"duration_seconds\": 0.001374, \"started_at\": \"2025-07-15T12:40:00.413230\", \"ended_at\": \"2025-07-15T12:40:00.414604\"}",
    "return_code": 0,
    "route_reason": "no_conditions_matched",
    "router_type": "condition",
    "selected_route": "manual_review_path",
    "started_at": "2025-07-15T12:40:00.413230",
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "underwriting_decision_router"
  },
  "validate_application_fields": {
    "completion_percentage": 100.0,
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"validation_passed\": true, \"missing_fields\": [], \"completion_percentage\": 100.0}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.242848,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:09.761672",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:09.518824",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:09.761672",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "missing_fields": [],
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"validation_passed\": true, \"missing_fields\": [], \"completion_percentage\": 100.0}\n",
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "validate_application_fields",
    "validation_passed": true
  },
  "verify_aadhaar": {
    "aadhaar_masked": "1234-5678-9012",
    "address_match": true,
    "biometric_verified": true,
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"aadhaar_masked\": \"1234-5678-9012\", \"is_valid\": true, \"address_match\": true, \"biometric_verified\": true, \"verification_score\": 98.2, \"last_updated\": \"2024-01-15\"}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.518329,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.826603",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.308274",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.826603",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "is_valid": true,
    "last_updated": "2024-01-15",
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"aadhaar_masked\": \"1234-5678-9012\", \"is_valid\": true, \"address_match\": true, \"biometric_verified\": true, \"verification_score\": 98.2, \"last_updated\": \"2024-01-15\"}\n",
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "verify_aadhaar",
    "verification_score": 98.2
  },
  "verify_address_proof": {
    "address_confirmed": "123 Main St, City, State 12345",
    "address_match": true,
    "document_date": "2024-06-15",
    "document_type": "utility_bill",
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"document_type\": \"utility_bill\", \"is_valid\": true, \"address_match\": true, \"document_date\": \"2024-06-15\", \"verification_score\": 92.3, \"address_confirmed\": \"123 Main St, City, State 12345\"}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.833477,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:15.219270",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.385793",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:15.219270",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "is_valid": true,
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"document_type\": \"utility_bill\", \"is_valid\": true, \"address_match\": true, \"document_date\": \"2024-06-15\", \"verification_score\": 92.3, \"address_confirmed\": \"123 Main St, City, State 12345\"}\n",
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "verify_address_proof",
    "verification_score": 92.3
  },
  "verify_employment": {
    "designation": "Senior Software Engineer",
    "employer_rating": "A+",
    "employment_confirmed": true,
    "employment_type": "permanent",
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"employment_confirmed\": true, \"designation\": \"Senior Software Engineer\", \"employment_type\": \"permanent\", \"probation_status\": \"confirmed\", \"employer_rating\": \"A+\", \"job_stability_score\": 88.5, \"reference_check_passed\": true, \"hr_contact_verified\": true}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.601832,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:18.230474",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.628642",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:18.230474",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "hr_contact_verified": true,
    "job_stability_score": 88.5,
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"employment_confirmed\": true, \"designation\": \"Senior Software Engineer\", \"employment_type\": \"permanent\", \"probation_status\": \"confirmed\", \"employer_rating\": \"A+\", \"job_stability_score\": 88.5, \"reference_check_passed\": true, \"hr_contact_verified\": true}\n",
    "probation_status": "confirmed",
    "reference_check_passed": true,
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "verify_employment"
  },
  "verify_pan_card": {
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"pan_number\": \"ABCDE1234F\", \"is_valid\": true, \"name_match\": true, \"status\": \"active\", \"verification_score\": 95.5, \"verified_name\": \"JOHN DOE\"}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.358562,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.626568",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.268006",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.626568",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "is_valid": true,
    "name_match": true,
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"pan_number\": \"ABCDE1234F\", \"is_valid\": true, \"name_match\": true, \"status\": \"active\", \"verification_score\": 95.5, \"verified_name\": \"JOHN DOE\"}\n",
    "pan_number": "ABCDE1234F",
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "verify_pan_card",
    "verification_score": 95.5,
    "verified_name": "JOHN DOE"
  },
  "verify_passport": {
    "document_provided": true,
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"passport_number\": \"A1234567\", \"is_valid\": true, \"expiry_date\": \"2030-12-31\", \"issuing_authority\": \"Government of India\", \"verification_score\": 96.8, \"document_provided\": true}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.616294,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.963870",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.347576",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:14.963870",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "expiry_date": "2030-12-31",
    "is_valid": true,
    "issuing_authority": "Government of India",
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"passport_number\": \"A1234567\", \"is_valid\": true, \"expiry_date\": \"2030-12-31\", \"issuing_authority\": \"Government of India\", \"verification_score\": 96.8, \"document_provided\": true}\n",
    "passport_number": "A1234567",
    "return_code": 0,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "verify_passport",
    "verification_score": 96.8
  },
  "verify_tax_returns": {
    "declared_income": 98000,
    "discrepancies_found": false,
    "execution_details": {
      "actual_result": {
        "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"declared_income\": 98000, \"tax_paid\": 12000, \"returns_filed_consistently\": true, \"income_growth_trend\": \"positive\", \"discrepancies_found\": false, \"verification_with_govt\": true, \"tax_compliance_score\": 92.0}\n",
        "return_code": 0,
        "status": "completed",
        "stderr": ""
      },
      "duration_seconds": 0.814493,
      "end_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:18.127688",
      "message_sent": true,
      "start_time": "2025-07-15T12:33:17.313195",
      "timestamp": "2025-07-15T12:33:18.127688",
      "worker_executed": true,
      "workers_notified": true
    },
    "income_growth_trend": "positive",
    "output": "__OUTPUTS__ {\"declared_income\": 98000, \"tax_paid\": 12000, \"returns_filed_consistently\": true, \"income_growth_trend\": \"positive\", \"discrepancies_found\": false, \"verification_with_govt\": true, \"tax_compliance_score\": 92.0}\n",
    "return_code": 0,
    "returns_filed_consistently": true,
    "status": "completed",
    "stderr": "",
    "task_id": "verify_tax_returns",
    "tax_compliance_score": 92.0,
    "tax_paid": 12000,
    "verification_with_govt": true
  }
}